Federalist 47 Analysis Essays

Found 66928 essays.

Significance of Anti-Federalist Papers Analytical Essay

Lim, ET 2011, ‘The Anti-Federalist Strand in Progressive Politics and Political Thought’, Political Research Quarterly, vol.Hackett Publishing, New York, NY.As stated in the paper, it is important that certain quarters surrender some portions of their natural freedom for effective administration of a balanced society.From the analysis of the assertions contained in the paper number eighty four, it is clear that the constitution that was in the process of being ratification contained some serious flows, and thus, it required attention to be paid to the areas of concern.The enactment of the bill of rights guarantees that natural freedom is balanced, so those who may benefit from violating the fundamental rights of others would be restricte...

968 words (2.4 pages)
The Federalist Papers, James Madison Essay

“Periodical Appeals to the People Considered.” The Federalist Papers No.In the Federalist Papers, James Madison and others outline their logic both in favor of and against ratification of the Constitution.“These Departments Should Not Be So Far Separated as to Have          Constitutional Control Over Each Other.” The Federalist Papers No.First of all, we must define what Madison means by “encroachment.”  In Federalist 47, Madison uses the British government’s constitution as a basis for his definition.“Method of Guarding Against the Encroachments of Any One Department of            Government by Appealing to the People Through a Convention.” The Federalist Papers           No.

1776 words (4.4 pages)
Separation of Powers UK

I will look at a few key Documents from the Federalist papers- 47 and 51- and also at the American Constitution, the Constitution should give an insight into what was originally envisaged and the Federalist papers should give more of an insight into what the purpose was.(To tackle how it was originally envisaged I will make reference to documents written by these parties and extensively use quotes from The Spirit of Laws, The Federalist Papers and the American Constitution to back up my points and to analysis what they originally envisaged) I will write about this in the section after discussing Montesquieu and his views on ‘Separation of powers’.So as ‘Originally Envisaged’ the constitution shows that three distinct branches were consid...

3307 words (8.3 pages)
History and Philosophy Essay

” Madison when writing Federalist No.” Articles of Confederation If the Articles of Confederation would not have failed then there would have been no Constitution and surely no Federalist Papers.Federalist As mentioned before, the people of New York were persuaded by the publishing of the Federalist for the ratification of the Constitution.“As a contribution to the ratification debate, The Federalist is an extended exercise in exposition, explanation, and persuasion.Hamilton harshly attacked the Articles of Confederation when he stated in Federalist No.

5221 words (13.1 pages)
Impact of federalist on U.S. constitution Essay

However in 1787-88, the same pages made fascinating reading material and countless allies of the new Constitution respected The Federalist mainly because of its pitiless condemnation of the “palpable defects of the subsisting Confederation.Publius the constitutional lawyer, in the bold person of Hamilton, reached the peak of intellectual power and of historical influence in the breathtaking assertion of judicial review in number 78.The Federalist is worthy of receiving acknowledgment for the simplicity with which it maintains that “both levels of government in a federal system must exercise direct authority over individuals, that the central government must enjoy unquestioned supremacy in its assigned fields, and that federalism is to be...

737 words (1.8 pages)
Crisis in Freedom Essay

Miller also argued that the Federalists struggle of the Republican’s disapproval was part of a battle between good and evil wherein the Federalist saw themselves as the better people.Due to this, as a reader, I was able to comprehend the message he wants to impart and made my own analysis about the subject matter.However, the Republican party who oppose the administration and the Federalist did all they can in order to act against the rule they are imposing upon America (Miller, n. d. ).The Federalist party who was holding the majority seat and congress and also the favor of the administration took advantage of this situation for their political gain.This mainly involves the Republicans disagreement with the decisions and actions of the ...

846 words (2.1 pages)
Anti-Federalists and Term Limits Essay

American President: Franklin Roosevelt.71 – The Duration in Office of the Executive, From the New York Packet (Hamilton) – Guest Blogger: Kyle Scott, PhD, Professor in the Political Science Department and Honors College at the University of Houston.Miller Center: University of Virginia.The American Monarchy.Constituting America.

1559 words (3.9 pages)
The War of 1812

The War of 1812: Past Justifications and Present Interpretations.Prologue to War.Hamilton founded the Federalist Party while Jefferson helped form the democratic Republican Party.New York: Hill .Through Jefferson’s idealism and his association with the average American, and his increasing attacks on what he called ‘federalist tyranny’, Jefferson was able to change the political landscape to win the 1800 general elections.

1290 words (3.2 pages)
Quebec referendum of 1995 Essay

Several federalist politicians attended the event, including Premier of Ontario Mike Harris, Premier of New Brunswick Frank McKenna, Premier of Nova Scotia John Savage and Premier of PEI.Polls starting in mid-October give the majority YES, which intensifies the federalist campaign.According to the federalist camp, the CBC's mandate is to promote national unity.The federalist camp argues that sovereignty would cause major damage to the economy, which is why many of its spokespersons are businessmen.Despite the efforts of the YES camp, it is the federalist camp which receives the support of American President Bill Clinton who affirms that the "looks like a country which does the right things, which moves in the good leadership, which has v...

5399 words (13.5 pages)
Constitutional Characterizations of Federalists and Democratic Republicans

Jefferson stated in his words he would abide strictly by the Constitution, but his actions demonstrated the opposite.Those who believe the stereotypes given to both Federalists and Democratic Republicans of lose and strict interpreters of the Constitution should evaluate two of the most crucial leaders, Jefferson and Madison, along with the actions taken during their presidencies.In Jefferson’s doctrine, he believed in a rigorous analysis of the Constitution, but his actions often proved otherwise.However James Madison’s rejection of the American System displays actions on which he favored rigorous interpretation of the Constitution (Document H).Madison was both a loose analyst of the Constitution as well as a strict one throughout vario...

794 words (2.0 pages)
Development Of The Two Party System

Chambers, William Nisbet.Avon, MA; Adams Media, 2007.Hofstadter, Richard.He had led to a new and extremely important analysis of the Constitution.The Idea of a Party System: The Legitimate Opposition in the United States; 1780-1840.

1472 words (3.7 pages)
Constitutional Period/Critical Period/Federalist Period

The Federalist Papers A series of essays written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay and submitted anonymously to gain support for the ratification of the Constitution.Thomas Jefferson Became the Republican Vice-President after the 1796 election under Federalist James Madison.The 1796 election was between John Adams, a Federalist, and Thomas Jefferson, a Republican.This was the first peaceful transfer of power and ended the Federalist decade.However, the leaders of the Federalist movement believed strongly in the necessity of a relatively strong central government.

6893 words (17.2 pages)
Jeffersonian Republicans and Federalists

From 1808 to 1807 domestic, political, and nation threats were on the door steps of Madison, and although he seemed to veer away from his true, original ideology the he initially spoke of, he did it for the future of the nation.The creator of this cartoon is none other than a Federalist portraying the views of the distaste towards the Embargo Act.Both men shown here, exhibited a true conflict between their ideas and their practices of said ideas.Jefferson and Madison, although both were destined to follow and obey the ideals of the Jeffersonian Republicans, they were both compelled to act accordingly to the problems at hand, even if that meant compromising some of their own beliefs.In the years 1801 to 1807, Jefferson and his policies wo...

1636 words (4.1 pages)
Federalists vs. Anti-Federalists

The Articles of Confederation were then replaced with the United States Constitution after it had been ratified by the remaining states.In conclusion, even though the Federalists won, both groups ultimately wanted to protect the human rights of the people, so in some way they both got what they wanted.For every argument the Anti-federalists made, the Federalists seemed to have a solution.The Federalists had many advantages that caused their victory, and the Anti-federalists were eventually forced to give in.The two groups probably had such different ideas on how the government should be run because the came from completely opposite backgrounds.

644 words (1.6 pages)
Federalist vs. Anti-Federalist

Other common interest of the Federalist and the Anti-Federalist was the preservation of liberty and government.The Federalist and the Anti-Federalist had very conflicting views on several things; however, they did have some similar views on topics such as on human nature and how it affected government.The Federalist had a belief that the common man was ignorant; wanted to be against the common good, and prone to corruption and greed.The Federalist Papers explain using a system of the separation of powers to minimize tyranny and protect democracy.The Anti-Federalist had more faith in human nature and man than the Federalist.

539 words (1.3 pages)
Kentucky Virginia Resolutions

Alexander Hamilton, the leader of the Federalist Party, was extremely opposed to state power, especially majority state power.The conflicting views of the Democratic-Republican Party and the Federalist Party were major factors of determining the politics of the newly developing United States in the late 1700s.Jefferson took a much more radical states rights stance than did Madison, however both ultimately reached the same goal, which was to reach a major opposition to Federalist views.As a result several joined the Democratic-Republican Party, many being converts from the Federalist Party.The Federalist position had been prominent in politics during the very early years of the nation, through Federalist presidents George Washington and J...

1065 words (2.7 pages)
The anti-Federalists Essay

This was the start of a great feud between Hamilton and Jefferson, the first real battle of political parties for election in office.It first started in speeches and local newspapers when three Federalists wrote in to share their opinions.The anti-Federalists followed suit and read their own speeche .In the fight between Federalists and anti-Federalists propaganda played a large role on both sides.The figurehead of the anti-Federalists was Thomas Jefferson who later became President of The United States.

468 words (1.2 pages)
Analyzing The Arguments For And Against Federalism Politics Essay

It can be said with great certainty that our nation would have looked incredibly different had the Federalists’ Constitution not won out, and while arguably our modern government differs from exactly what the Founding Fathers foresaw, their proposed government holds true today.Personally, I cannot deny a shared desire with the Anti-Federalists for a less power national government-in many ways, it oversteps its bounds and does so by the allowances of the Constitution, particularly concerning commerce.However, not only would the government as established by the Constitution protect against foreign danger, it would defend the rights of its people from internal threat; namely, the threat of faction as understood to be special interests of a ...

2026 words (5.1 pages)
Stand Your Ground Law Debate “Cons” Essay

(Federalist 10) IV.The Federalist argued that judicial review was necessary to protect the judicial branch from the Legislature.State when The Federalist was printed and published.The Federalist said the maxim of complete separation of powers is misunderstood.The dates of the ratification of the Constitution by the States c. The Federalist’s influence beyond the ratification .

437 words (1.1 pages)
Federalist Party Achievements And Shortcomings

The Federalists were a very conservative party, and America was in a radical, democratic phase.Federalists were considered to be aristocrats, and they were treated with much disfavor.The primary reason for this was the fact that the Federalist Party was the party of the rich.The second reason why the Federalists faded away was their inability to change.Examining the Federalist Party’s Achievements and Shortcomings The Federalist Party, despite its many shortcomings and its callow attitude towards the people actually managed to accomplish quite a bit while in power in the early days of America.

344 words (0.9 pages)
To Ratify or Not to Ratify

They never had agreed or approved in the necessary and the proper clause and believed that it gave way to much power to the national government.They have feared about things, but I believe they were going the right way on insisting on have the Bill of Rights staying.If you had to choose sides, would you side with the Federalists or Anti-Federalists?The Anti-Federalist also didn’t like that when everything was in peace the Federalist had to have a army.They had favored ratification on the constitution.

304 words (0.8 pages)
Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson

Resolving this problem made possible one of the distinctive features of the Constitution – its distribution of powers between the national and state governments.One issue, agreed finally by both factions was the question of sovereignty.It would flow ultimately from the people.Alexander Hamilton and the Federalists, and Thomas Jefferson and the Anti-Federalists disagreed about certain decisive issues about the Constitution, but both wanted the best government for the nation.Hamilton was the creator of the Federalist Party which represented favor in strong central government, a Federal Bank, and a stable financial system.

676 words (1.7 pages)
The formation of the Political Parties

Some important Federalist Party supporters included George Washington, John Adams, John Jay, and Alexander Hamilton.There were some people who didn’t agree with everything that the Federalist Party believed.Federalist Alexander Hamilton once said, “Clouds and darkness would not then rest upon the issue as they now do, I own I do not like the comparison.” When Hamilton said this spark flew between the republicans and the federalists.Mostly lawyers, big businessmen, bankers, merchants, and professionals made up the Federalist Party.As you can see, there were many differences between the Federalist and Democratic Republican Parties.

1114 words (2.8 pages)
Federalists vs Democratic Republicans Essay

The Democratic Republicans belief in a severely limited federal government led to the support of strict interpretation of the Constitution, limited national spending, and a defensive navy.The Federalists wanted a strong navy which would allow the United States to assert itself on the world stage.7 On the other hand, the Democratic Republicans were more isolationist and wanted a limited navy for defense only.At the core of the Federalist political beliefs was a strong central government.Their political beliefs centered on a powerful central government and resulted in the support of looser interpretation of the Constitution, unlimited national spending, and a strong navy.These parties were the Federalist Party, led by Alexander Hamilton, a...

911 words (2.3 pages)
Comparing Of The Presidencies Of Obama And Bush Politics Essay

With this perspective in mind, we can now compare the two presidents.Furthermore, his actions to weaken the federal government so as to strengthen the conservative side of the government wing show that he is more anti-federalist than a federalist.Though it can be seen that through his action, President Obama is setting into the mold of a federalist it is still too young in his presidential term to conclude on the issue.Though neither president exactly fits into the mould of either federalists or anti-federalists, it can be summarized that through their actions during their term of presidency, George.Former president Bush was largely conservative and this was evident through the socio-economic problems that his administration¿½s actions c...

1265 words (3.2 pages)
1996 Ap Us History Free Response dbq Essay

Through the United States doubling in size, the influence of the much faded Federalist ideals would further weaken because the Federalists were already out of office and faced steadily diminishing influence in American society.Thus, Jefferson adopted the Federalist ideal of “loose construction” through buying land to expand America’s power, even though Jefferson contemplated if the purchase was unconstitutional.The Federalist, Daniel Webster, stepped aside from the common Federalists ideal.Thus, in a respect, the Federalist ideas did not begin to fade from public view after John Adams was voted out of office, but instead was expressed to the public through the opposing party’s top officials, Thomas Jefferson and James Madison.Thus, Jeffe...

1352 words (3.4 pages)
The Vital Considerations in the Framing of the Constitution

The tensions inherent in the Federalist and Anti-Federalist models gave rise to the Republican and Democrat parties.(Storing, 1981) A consideration of Brutus’ and Storing’s work leads us to a definition of the Anti- Federalist model of government as one that upholds the rights of the individual, provides measures that will resist a descent into a ‘tyrannic aristocracy,’ and emphasizes a small national government as opposed to a large representative one.Do you agree that Federalist and anti-federalist traditions are alive today or has one eclipsed the other?The dynamic opposition of Federalist and Anti-Federalist political lines of governance continues to this day.In another case, Goldwin and Schambra (1980) argue on the side of the Anti-...

3391 words (8.5 pages)
The Federalists vs. The Anti-Federalists

They see the Supreme Court undemocratic due to the fact that the judges presiding on it will be appointed rather then elected.(pp.75) This is one of the prime objections the Anti-Federalist make to the Constitution.James Madison and Alexander Hamilton, in writing the Federalist Papers, provide the strongest arguments in support of it.The Constitution states in Article II (section 2) that the executive shall appoint the judges to the Supreme Court and that their appointment must be conferred upon by two thirds of the Senate.78, argues that it is essential for the members of the court to be free from legislative encroachment.

1290 words (3.2 pages)
Jefferson and Madison

All of these things that Madison approved were principles that were cornerstones of the Federalist beliefs.This gigantic sale would prove to be one of the lasting legacies of his Presidency, thus illustrating him as a man who believed in Federalist principles.Perhaps the best way to put it is that they both were Democratic – Republicans with Federalist tendencies.In the Nineteenth Century, the Federalist and Democratic – Republican parties were greatly opposed to one another.James Madison was also a creator of the Democratic – Republican party, although he was originally a Federalist and the author of The Federalist Papers, Madison ran as a Democratic – Republican is the elections of 1808 and 1812. .

468 words (1.2 pages)
Advocates of the American Constitution Essay

Of the former The Federalist is by far the most famous and certainly the most widely read in our day.Once described (and dismissed) as mere nay-Sayers and men of little faith, the Anti-federalists are now more often regarded as the other founders.If Hamilton, Madison, and Jay had revealed their identity in The Federalist Papers then they would have been known as advocates of specific positions instead of being recognized by their arguments, and also this would have become a part of the argument over the Constitution.The Federalist no.They emerged as advocates of states’ rights and this idea was clearly explained in The Federalist Papers, yet they were also evidently advocating for a strong national government.

1001 words (2.5 pages)

Did not find what you were looking for?

We will write for you an essay on any given topic for 3 hours

Order now!
× We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Login with Social Media