Dougherty, KL 2009, ‘An Empirical Test of Federalist and Anti-Federalist Theories of State Contributions, 1775-1783‘, Social Science History, vol.Storing, HJ 1981, The Complete Anti-Federalist, Volume 1, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Thus, the anti-federalist paper number eighty four was of great significance as it helped shape the future bill of rights adopted in the current constitution.From the analysis of the assertions contained in the paper number eighty four, it is clear that the constitution that was in the process of being ratification contained some serious flows, and thus, it required attention to be paid to the areas of concern.Hackett Publishing, New York, NY.
968 words (2.4 pages)
New York: McLean’s Edition, 1787.Due process helps to protect a person against unfair and false accusations.Due process helps the citizens of the United States from being taken advantage of.Criminal Procedure: The meaning of Due Process .I think that it is so important that the fore fathers of our country put in place the Fifth Amendment and the fourteenth amendment guarantee us due process.
1214 words (3.0 pages)
Federalist As mentioned before, the people of New York were persuaded by the publishing of the Federalist for the ratification of the Constitution.” Madison when writing Federalist No.“As a contribution to the ratification debate, The Federalist is an extended exercise in exposition, explanation, and persuasion.As a work of political theory, then, The Federalist flies fairly close to the ground, rarely soaring into the stratosphere of philosophical abstraction.” The Federalist justifies why the authors found the Articles of Confederation unacceptable; why they wanted to separate the powers of the government’s branches; why they split the national legislature into two different houses; why they thought that a federal court for the final a...
5221 words (13.1 pages)
15 Dec. 2012. .“The Whiskey Rebellion.” PBS.Kohn, Richard H. “The Washington Administration’s Desicion to Crush The Whiskey Rebellion.” Journal of American History 59.3 (n.d.): 567-84.This party supported states’ rights against the power of the federal government, which led to the fall of the Federalist party of Washington and Hamilton (anonymous “Whiskey Rebellion”).“Whiskey Rebellion.” N.p., n.d.
720 words (1.8 pages)
Keeping in mind that the Constitution was legitimately ratified by 9 of the 13 states, the number of votes needed, without the votes of New York and Virginia, it will not be wrong to make an assumption that the Constitution would have been ratified even without The Federalist..’ And still in the some parts of Federalist numbers 15 to 22 there are concrete annotations on one of the key argument of The Federalist: the dreadful circumstance of a weak government in a disordered society.However in 1787-88, the same pages made fascinating reading material and countless allies of the new Constitution respected The Federalist mainly because of its pitiless condemnation of the “palpable defects of the subsisting Confederation.The Federalist is ne...
737 words (1.8 pages)
The article gave emphasis on the Federalist party that was leading the United States of America during the creation of the Alien and Sedition Acts.However, the Republican party who oppose the administration and the Federalist did all they can in order to act against the rule they are imposing upon America (Miller, n. d. ).Reference Miller, J. C. Crisis in Freedom: The Alien and Sedition Acts.This mainly involves the Republicans disagreement with the decisions and actions of the Federalist with regards to the anti-French sentiments that was taking place during that time.John Miller highlighted the conflict of beliefs between the Federalist and the Republican parties.
846 words (2.1 pages)
Both writings represent an attempt by the framers to pinpoint the points of danger and structural weakness in both the democratic form of government and the innate nature of the citizens who comprise that democracy.In conclusion, Hamilton’s “Federalist #70” is one of the most important political documents associated with the framing of the US constitution and forms a remarkable counterpoint to Madison’s thought.Arguing for a strong, central figure of authority in the American President, Alexander Hamilton made his feelings quite explicit in Federalist No.As Madison remarks in the opening lines of his now-famous “Federalist #51”, there can be no more urgent an issue, nor one which so directly confronts both the self-interested nature of t...
1671 words (4.2 pages)
The first state that ratified the Constitution, although its convention was not the first to assemble, was Delaware, followed by Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Georgia, and Connecticut.These freedoms include freedom of speech, the right to bear arms, the right to deny refuge to soldiers, the right to privacy from search, trial by jury, innocent until proven guilty, the right to representation and to a speedy trial, no cruel and unusual punishment, the right to always have rights, and the right for states to rule on things not mentioned in the Constitution.Writing on states’ rights, Federalist No.84, asserting that a government unrestrained by such a bill could easily devolve into tyranny.By comparison of the elite Federalist camp, the anti-Fe...
5101 words (12.8 pages)
August 4, 2010 – Federalist Paper No.Constituting America.In 1787, with America in it’s infancy, the Anti-Federalists wrote responses to the Federalist papers and the Federalist support of what became the U.S. Constitution.Miller Center: University of Virginia.American President: Franklin Roosevelt.
1559 words (3.9 pages)
The War of 1812: Past Justifications and Present Interpretations.Hamilton founded the Federalist Party while Jefferson helped form the democratic Republican Party.Massachusetts: Lexington.Wiltse, Charles M. 1961.Berkeley: University of California Press.
1290 words (3.2 pages)
He did not believe the creation of roads and canals was the same as regulating commerce, and because of this, he rejected the system.All of these decisions made, whether abiding strictly to the Constitution or not, have made a profound impact on American history.Madison was both a loose analyst of the Constitution as well as a strict one throughout various scenarios he faced in office.Despite Madison being prominent among the Federalist Party, Madison also demonstrated that Federalists can be both loose as well strict constructionists.Jefferson stated in his words he would abide strictly by the Constitution, but his actions demonstrated the opposite.
794 words (2.0 pages)
The Idea of a Party System: The Legitimate Opposition in the United States; 1780-1840.Berkeley: University of California, 1969.Hofstadter, Richard.Avon, MA; Adams Media, 2007.New York; Oxford University Press, 1967.
1472 words (3.7 pages)
The Federalist Party had seen their imminent demise because of the opposition of war that they had shown.Both men shown here, exhibited a true conflict between their ideas and their practices of said ideas.In the years 1801 to 1807, Jefferson and his policies would emulate the true republican priorities, meaning that federal powers would be decreased.From 1808 to 1807 domestic, political, and nation threats were on the door steps of Madison, and although he seemed to veer away from his true, original ideology the he initially spoke of, he did it for the future of the nation.The creator of this cartoon is none other than a Federalist portraying the views of the distaste towards the Embargo Act.
1636 words (4.1 pages)
In conclusion, even though the Federalists won, both groups ultimately wanted to protect the human rights of the people, so in some way they both got what they wanted.They did not have the capability of gaining more supporters because they didn’t have the means to disperse their ideas to many other people.The Articles of Confederation were then replaced with the United States Constitution after it had been ratified by the remaining states.They disagreed with the Federalist idea of a strong central government.In the end, the Federalists won; the Anti-federalists proved to be no match for them.
644 words (1.6 pages)
I believe that Anti-Federalist and Federalist views on human nature’s role in government are both have similar traits to my own.I believe that if the Anti-Federalist did not order the Declaration of Independence to be added into the Constitution then The United States would have fell victim to a complete dictatorship.I agree with a quote from Federalist James Madison that states “ambition must be made to counteract ambition”.The Federalist had a belief that the common man was ignorant; wanted to be against the common good, and prone to corruption and greed.Madison’s idea of government as a reflection of human nature is described in Federalist Papers.
539 words (1.3 pages)
Jefferson took a much more radical states rights stance than did Madison, however both ultimately reached the same goal, which was to reach a major opposition to Federalist views.However through the very controversial actions of the Federalist Party, in regards to the Whiskey Rebellion, and the Alien and Sedition Acts, opposition to the Federalist Party grew substantially in the Democratic Republicans.The Federalist position had been prominent in politics during the very early years of the nation, through Federalist presidents George Washington and John Adams.It was through the actions of the members of the Democratic-Republicans, through events including The Whiskey Rebellion of 1794, and the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions of 1798, t...
1065 words (2.7 pages)
In the fight between Federalists and anti-Federalists propaganda played a large role on both sides.Jefferson was totally against this, he believed that the Constitution could do the things which the Constitution states it can and nothing should be assumed.This was the start of a great feud between Hamilton and Jefferson, the first real battle of political parties for election in office.It first started in speeches and local newspapers when three Federalists wrote in to share their opinions.He was for a strong central government, which was more of a Federalist’s view.
468 words (1.2 pages)
But although the Federalists won, the vestiges of those in opposition to our Constitution reside in our Bill of Rights, however a shadow of the Anti-Federalists’ wishes it may be.The government of today exists as a functioning, complex, albeit politically-motivated entity, and as a nation we progress and have not devolved into tyranny as the Anti-Federalists feared.A clearer, more in-depth Bill of Rights would definitely provide for more protection from government, but overall the complete liberties of our nation leave little room for complaint.Personally, I cannot deny a shared desire with the Anti-Federalists for a less power national government-in many ways, it oversteps its bounds and does so by the allowances of the Constitution, pa...
2026 words (5.1 pages)
The Federalist said the maxim of complete separation of powers is misunderstood.The Federalist argued that judicial review was necessary to protect the judicial branch from the Legislature.(Federalist 10) IV.(Montesquieu) c. The branches need some limited power of the other branches to protect themselves from encroachment of the other branches (Federalist 51) A.State when The Federalist was printed and published.
437 words (1.1 pages)
Yet the Federalist Party ” despite stabilizing the economy, securing the power of the federal government, and preserving the infant nation ” was destined to die.The primary reason for this was the fact that the Federalist Party was the party of the rich.The Federalists were a very conservative party, and America was in a radical, democratic phase.Without the Federalist Bank, America would have floundered and quickly imploded.The second reason why the Federalists faded away was their inability to change.
344 words (0.9 pages)
Answer: I have to choose one side, it would have to be the Anti-Federalist because they were the ones that insisted on having the Bill of rights in the constitution.Explain why you sided with the particular group by summarizing, in your own words, their arguments.If you had to choose sides, would you side with the Federalists or Anti-Federalists?They had feared that a strong executive branch would have lead to monarchy.Federalist arguments .
304 words (0.8 pages)
Note: This is a DBQ Essay for an AP American Histroy Class and may need more bcakground information and do not abreviate the word document!These two great leaders contributed so much to the beginning of this great nation.The Federalists brought about a great contribution; the Bank of the United States.The Anti-Federalists helped the individual people of the United States with the Bill of Rights.Even if they did not agree with each other, they both wanted America’s government and economy to grow, prosper, and to bring the nation under a firm, stable Constitution.
676 words (1.7 pages)
This Rebellion was a big morale booster for the people of America and showed that a federalist type government could work in America.The Federalists had an advantage during this time period; the President George Washington’s regime was mostly pro federalist.The Federalist Party consisted of people who were very much Anglophiles.There were some people who didn’t agree with everything that the Federalist Party believed.As you can see, there were many differences between the Federalist and Democratic Republican Parties.
1114 words (2.8 pages)
The issues that these first two political parties brought to debate still lie at the foundation of many of today’s political viewpoints.The Federalists’ socioeconomic beliefs centered on rule by the educated elite and resulted in a conservative pro-business outlook.The Federalist and Democratic Republican parties differed in their core beliefs in socioeconomics and politics.At the core of the Federalist political beliefs was a strong central government.The Federalists wanted a strong navy which would allow the United States to assert itself on the world stage.7 On the other hand, the Democratic Republicans were more isolationist and wanted a limited navy for defense only.
911 words (2.3 pages)
W. Bush was more of an anti-federalist and President elect Barrack Obama more of a federalist.His actions largely bordering on developing policies that benefit all Americans equally show a federalist nature.Furthermore, his actions to weaken the federal government so as to strengthen the conservative side of the government wing show that he is more anti-federalist than a federalist.Thus it can be seen that he would largely fit in with the anti-federalist group.President Obama, however, would more fit in with the federalist group.
1265 words (3.2 pages)
John Randolph, who was a Democratic Republican, began to state the obvious near the end of Madison’s presidency, “…the present government have renounced the true republican principles of Jefferson’s administration.” (Document F) The Jeffersonian Republicans were feeling the pressure of addressing national issues at different angles and they could not remain solid on their original ideals, “Their (Jeffersonian Republicans) principle now is old Federalism.” (Document F) In a sense, Thomas Jefferson was slowly replacing his own political party ideals with Federalist ideals.The characterization of the two parties did not remain accurate during the presidencies of Jefferson and Madison because of the pressure during the possession of the high...
1352 words (3.4 pages)
The Federalist Papers.Based on Elazar and Publius’ works, the federalist model of government can be defined as a system that is based on contractual arrangements, as opposed to organic ties; and uses the power of representation to limit the influence of factions on the public.In another case, Goldwin and Schambra (1980) argue on the side of the Anti-Federalists and Democrats when they suggest that the Federalist framers of the Constitution were primarily concerned with preserving their property, and not with giving democracy a free rein.(Storing, 1981) A consideration of Brutus’ and Storing’s work leads us to a definition of the Anti- Federalist model of government as one that upholds the rights of the individual, provides measures that ...
3391 words (8.5 pages)
(pp.75) This is one of the prime objections the Anti-Federalist make to the Constitution.The Constitution states in Article II (section 2) that the executive shall appoint the judges to the Supreme Court and that their appointment must be conferred upon by two thirds of the Senate.The Anti-Federalists lost the ratification debate because they failed to present a clear and convincing account of a constitutional plan that stood between the Articles of Confederation, which they acknowledged was unable to provide for the requirements of union, and the Constitution proposed by the Federal Convention, which they feared would produce a consolidation of power.I will argue that federalist provide greater justification for why these two branches e...
1290 words (3.2 pages)
In the Nineteenth Century, the Federalist and Democratic – Republican parties were greatly opposed to one another.Once again, Jefferson used the Federalist principle of a strong federal government.All of these things that Madison approved were principles that were cornerstones of the Federalist beliefs.It is quite evident that although Thomas Jefferson and James Madison were Democratic – Republicans in their own mind, both of their presidencies are filled with the principles of the Federalists.Obviously, broadening the powers of the Presidency would make the federal government much stronger, something that was a Federalist principle and greatly opposed by the Democratic – Republican party.
468 words (1.2 pages)
If Hamilton, Madison, and Jay had revealed their identity in The Federalist Papers then they would have been known as advocates of specific positions instead of being recognized by their arguments, and also this would have become a part of the argument over the Constitution.At the same time as replying to explicit Anti-federalist arguments, The Federalist presented an integrated theory of the philosophies upon which the new Constitution was based.The Federalist no.Of the former The Federalist is by far the most famous and certainly the most widely read in our day.By opting for a name like Publius, the authors of the Federalist were following a practice which was common among the eighteenth-century writers.
1001 words (2.5 pages)