For every argument the Anti-federalists made, the Federalists seemed to have a solution.They disagreed with the Federalist idea of a strong central government.In conclusion, even though the Federalists won, both groups ultimately wanted to protect the human rights of the people, so in some way they both got what they wanted.In the end, the Federalists won; the Anti-federalists proved to be no match for them.The Articles of Confederation were then replaced with the United States Constitution after it had been ratified by the remaining states.
644 words (1.6 pages)
One of the authors of the Federalist Papers was James Madison.The Federalist and the Anti-Federalist had very conflicting views on several things; however, they did have some similar views on topics such as on human nature and how it affected government.I believe that if the Anti-Federalist did not order the Declaration of Independence to be added into the Constitution then The United States would have fell victim to a complete dictatorship.The Federalist Papers explain using a system of the separation of powers to minimize tyranny and protect democracy.I agree with a quote from Federalist James Madison that states “ambition must be made to counteract ambition”.
539 words (1.3 pages)
He was for a strong central government, which was more of a Federalist’s view.The figurehead of the anti-Federalists was Thomas Jefferson who later became President of The United States.Jefferson was totally against this, he believed that the Constitution could do the things which the Constitution states it can and nothing should be assumed.The anti-Federalists followed suit and read their own speeche .This was the start of a great feud between Hamilton and Jefferson, the first real battle of political parties for election in office.
468 words (1.2 pages)
A clearer, more in-depth Bill of Rights would definitely provide for more protection from government, but overall the complete liberties of our nation leave little room for complaint.The government of today exists as a functioning, complex, albeit politically-motivated entity, and as a nation we progress and have not devolved into tyranny as the Anti-Federalists feared.Among them, powers of the Supreme Court and executive were specified to name a few, and many government actions would pass through the state governments first.As evidenced by the progression of history, the Federalists eventually won out in the fight over the Constitution-the proposed contract saw ratification and institution and today we are the United States of America w...
2026 words (5.1 pages)
It was under the administration of George Washington in 1794, that great opposition to the federalist position came into play.The Alien and Sedition Acts were passed by the predominantly Federalist Congress in order to minimize their opposition by the Democratic Republicans.As a result several joined the Democratic-Republican Party, many being converts from the Federalist Party.Alexander Hamilton, the leader of the Federalist Party, was extremely opposed to state power, especially majority state power.The Federalist position had been prominent in politics during the very early years of the nation, through Federalist presidents George Washington and John Adams.
1065 words (2.7 pages)
(pp.75) This is one of the prime objections the Anti-Federalist make to the Constitution.I will argue that federalist provide greater justification for why these two branches enumerated in the Constitution are indeed democratic (as examined through the Federalist view of republican government).But Hamilton, Federalist No.And yet the periodic and contemporary constitutional debates over federalism, over the extent of legislative and executive power, and over individual rights and judicial review reflect the different conceptions of republican government that were developed in the founding dialogue over the Constitution.The Constitution states in Article II (section 2) that the executive shall appoint the judges to the Supreme Court and th...
1290 words (3.2 pages)
The Anti-Federalist also didn’t like that when everything was in peace the Federalist had to have a army.Answer: I have to choose one side, it would have to be the Anti-Federalist because they were the ones that insisted on having the Bill of rights in the constitution.Explain why you sided with the particular group by summarizing, in your own words, their arguments.They have feared about things, but I believe they were going the right way on insisting on have the Bill of Rights staying.Federalist arguments .
304 words (0.8 pages)
(Montesquieu) c. The branches need some limited power of the other branches to protect themselves from encroachment of the other branches (Federalist 51) A.The Federalist said the maxim of complete separation of powers is misunderstood.Describe The Federalist Papers are and when they started b. Thesis: The Federalist influenced the ratification of the Constitution by making some of their most important arguments, including the importance of being in a Union by having a Constitution, answering to the objections made by the Anti-federalists about separation of powers, and defending opposing arguments made against the characteristics of the executive and judicial branch as provided in the Constitution.Discuss the intentions and purposes of ...
437 words (1.1 pages)
Lim, ET 2011, ‘The Anti-Federalist Strand in Progressive Politics and Political Thought’, Political Research Quarterly, vol.Hackett Publishing, New York, NY.Dougherty, KL 2009, ‘An Empirical Test of Federalist and Anti-Federalist Theories of State Contributions, 1775-1783‘, Social Science History, vol.The journey towards the inclusion of this important segment in the constitution can be traced to the anti-federalist paper number eighty four that criticizes the main law due to its lack of a clear stand on human rights.Storing, HJ 1981, The Complete Anti-Federalist, Volume 1, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
968 words (2.4 pages)
Based on Elazar and Publius’ works, the federalist model of government can be defined as a system that is based on contractual arrangements, as opposed to organic ties; and uses the power of representation to limit the influence of factions on the public.The dynamic opposition of Federalist and Anti-Federalist political lines of governance continues to this day.In another case, Goldwin and Schambra (1980) argue on the side of the Anti-Federalists and Democrats when they suggest that the Federalist framers of the Constitution were primarily concerned with preserving their property, and not with giving democracy a free rein.The tensions inherent in the Federalist and Anti-Federalist models gave rise to the Republican and Democrat parties.C...
3391 words (8.5 pages)
Though neither president exactly fits into the mould of either federalists or anti-federalists, it can be summarized that through their actions during their term of presidency, George.President Obama, however, would more fit in with the federalist group.Thus it can be seen that he would largely fit in with the anti-federalist group.W. Bush was more of an anti-federalist and President elect Barrack Obama more of a federalist.With this perspective in mind, we can now compare the two presidents.
1265 words (3.2 pages)
The Anti-Federalists helped the individual people of the United States with the Bill of Rights.It would flow ultimately from the people.Hamilton was the creator of the Federalist Party which represented favor in strong central government, a Federal Bank, and a stable financial system.The Federalists brought about a great contribution; the Bank of the United States.Resolving this problem made possible one of the distinctive features of the Constitution – its distribution of powers between the national and state governments.
676 words (1.7 pages)
In general, the Anti-Federalists were the poorer classes of society.Anti-Federalists opposed omitting any reference to God and therefore, the law should go with the laws of God.They believed that the Articles of Confederation were a good plan for the nation, and they opposed strong central government, believing that it threatened the rights of the common people.They believed the constitution favored wealthy men and preserved their power, because the constitution opposed the drawing of annual elections for representatives.They also opposed a standing army and the constitution.
421 words (1.1 pages)
The American Monarchy.American President: Franklin Roosevelt.In 1787, with America in it’s infancy, the Anti-Federalists wrote responses to the Federalist papers and the Federalist support of what became the U.S. Constitution.August 4, 2010 – Federalist Paper No.71 – The Duration in Office of the Executive, From the New York Packet (Hamilton) – Guest Blogger: Kyle Scott, PhD, Professor in the Political Science Department and Honors College at the University of Houston.
1559 words (3.9 pages)
Federalist arguments .-The new constitution would help secure the library for which Americans had fought for Mason remained adamant that a bill of rights be included in the new national constitution, so adamant that he refused to sign the document without one.Would a powerful president turn into a tyrannical king?Had not Americans just fought and died to secure liberty against such threats?I would chose to be on the anti-federalist side.
428 words (1.1 pages)
treatment of citizens.An individual’s attitude about federalism .Uniform laws passed by a unitary government tend to emphasize equal .The federalist system is rooted in the .and state governments.
438 words (1.1 pages)
Once described (and dismissed) as mere nay-Sayers and men of little faith, the Anti-federalists are now more often regarded as the other founders.By opting for a name like Publius, the authors of the Federalist were following a practice which was common among the eighteenth-century writers.At the same time as replying to explicit Anti-federalist arguments, The Federalist presented an integrated theory of the philosophies upon which the new Constitution was based.Countering the belief, which is often ascribed to Montesquieu, that republics could stay alive only in small areas taken by identical inhabitants, Madison in The Federalist no.They emerged as advocates of states’ rights and this idea was clearly explained in The Federalist Papers...
1001 words (2.5 pages)
Though neither president exactly fits into the mould of either federalists or anti-federalists, it can be summarized that through their actions during their term of presidency, George.His actions largely bordering on developing policies that benefit all Americans equally show a federalist nature.President Obama, however, would more fit in with the federalist group.Former president Bush was largely conservative and this was evident through the socio-economic problems that his administration’s actions caused.His call to strengthen the federal government and his actions of abandoning the Bush administration policies further reinforce this fact.
1030 words (2.6 pages)
Though victorious, the North’s celebration would be short lived.The treaty ultimately turned the two parties against one another, creating a rift that would eventually lead to the Federalists demise.A short time later the war would end at Appomattox Courthouse as the Confederate force led by Robert E. Lee surrendered on April 9th.Although the Federalists Party would barely survive through the election of 1796, the first election with candidates belonging to official parties that awarded John Adams the presidency, the internal tension within the party would caus... .Though the path was a struggle of conflicting views diverging parties into two, and victories unifying and reviving the embattled, political parties have managed to survive th...
422 words (1.1 pages)
The response given to the Federalists’ essays began with an author known as “A FEDERALIST”: .The first state that ratified the Constitution, although its convention was not the first to assemble, was Delaware, followed by Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Georgia, and Connecticut.States felt they would retain their rights through the freedoms afforded through the Bill of Rights.None of this was possible under British rule; power was transferred from the center to the people.Ratification of the Constitution was four states away .
5101 words (12.8 pages)
But here was the rub: Publius and his fellow Federalists were defending a design for a new kind of republic, the likes of which had never previously existed, an enlarged or extended republic.Publius, by contrast, defended the new design as being fully in conformity… to the true principles of republican government as well as republican in spirit and wholly and purely republican.The Federalist Papers went further than protecting the status quo; it wanted and searched for support for a radical form of government, which was unfamiliar in world history and thus a new revolution took place.The plan of a successful nation would have remained a thought, if the Anti-Federalists would have succeeded.The advocates are generally men not very friendl...
709 words (1.8 pages)
Some important Federalist party supporters were: George Washington, John Adams, John Jay, and Alexander Hamilton.Though the Democrat and Republican Parties are still around to this day, the issues they support are very different than they used to be.different ideas on the best way to run the nation and the best way to govern the people we will have a multi-party political system.The war of 1812 ended the Federalist Party.After the war, the republicans supported high tariffs and promoted economic development.
581 words (1.5 pages)
“First Party System,” Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia .The Federalist Party consisted of mostly wealthy men, many of whom were lawyers, businessmen, bankers, and merchants.Foundation, Inc.“Political Parties in the United States,” Microsoft® Encarta® Online Encyclopedia .Works Cited and Resources Used: .
1022 words (2.6 pages)
New York: Literary Classics of the United States:, 1993.In addition, the anti-federalists’ main reason for not accepting the ratification process was that the bill of rights had not been included.By separating the basic powers of government into three equal branches, and not giving too much power group, the constitution would provide balance and prevent potential for tyranny.Federal courts would thus protect the citizens from government abuse and guarantee their freedom.The Debate on the Constitution: Federalist and Anti-federalist Speeches, Articles, and Letters during the Struggle over Ratification.
799 words (2.0 pages)
Although it was originally constructed as a sign of unity for the United States, it resulted in the disunity and tension which over all led to the Civil War.The consequent argument between Federalists and Anti-Federalists produced the Bill of Rights, but it certainly did not solve the disagreement between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists since they were still opposing the federal government, even after the declaration of the Bill of Rights.But although the Anti-Federalists believed that such a government would limit not only the supreme power of the states but also their own power within those states.The writers of the Constitution can be blamed for not settling the issue of slavery, and leaving it to grow and expand into the largest...
495 words (1.2 pages)
The main significance of The Federalist in the 1788 events was like a sort of debater’s handbook in Virginia and New York.Publius the constitutional lawyer, in the bold person of Hamilton, reached the peak of intellectual power and of historical influence in the breathtaking assertion of judicial review in number 78.” It could be said easily that The Federalist transformed federalism from a mere system into an article of faith, from a sporadic accident of history into a permanent illustration of the principles of constitutionalism.The Federalist was at first published in New York newspapers with the precise intention of convincing the huge Anti-federalist population of New York to vote in support of the Constitution.The Federalist is wor...
737 words (1.8 pages)
Federalist As mentioned before, the people of New York were persuaded by the publishing of the Federalist for the ratification of the Constitution.Hamilton harshly attacked the Articles of Confederation when he stated in Federalist No.” The Federalist justifies why the authors found the Articles of Confederation unacceptable; why they wanted to separate the powers of the government’s branches; why they split the national legislature into two different houses; why they thought that a federal court for the final appeal was desirable and necessary; why they banned titles of nobility; why they said that a bill of rights was a needless addition, and why a lot of other permissions and prohibitions were written into the Constitution or excludes...
5221 words (13.1 pages)
States then argued with ever policy proposed by the federal government.They felt their right to govern the people of their own state was being taken away.They thought state power would become frail if run by a national government.Some of these arguments, such as slavery, are what eventually led to the Civil War.People feared the establishment of a strong federal government because no two states had the same interests.
544 words (1.4 pages)
The Federalist took control of the country by using the threat of the French as the justification for their actions.Reference Miller, J. C. Crisis in Freedom: The Alien and Sedition Acts.Miller’s article was able to show that freedom could indeed be in crisis at times.However, the Republican party who oppose the administration and the Federalist did all they can in order to act against the rule they are imposing upon America (Miller, n. d. ).Miller also argued that the Federalists struggle of the Republican’s disapproval was part of a battle between good and evil wherein the Federalist saw themselves as the better people.
846 words (2.1 pages)
Only the wealthy could afford slaves.The benefits and pitfalls that go hand-in-hand with a democratic society call for a fluid and amendable constitution.Americans held an optimistic view of the nation’s manifest destiny.Nevertheless, the strengths outweigh the weaknesses as evidenced by the overall equitable conditions amidst the citizens, and the equal opportunities available to all.There were greater threats to democracy during the first decades of U.S. independence that are far more important to the significance of the period.
781 words (2.0 pages)