Is War Good Or Bad Essays

As you can see, there are many bad and good sides of war.If the countries do not feel satisfied they might go into a second war and then a third and so on.Long-term wise a war could rebuild the economy of a country.The ongoing debate, is war good or bad?So I think we should always find more peaceful ways than war.

This source could have been exaggerated and/or edited before it was published because at the time of its publish it was roughly fifty years after the war and the Reader’s Digest are an entertainment magazine, not a war magazine.In World War II, millions of children were evacuated into the surrounding countryside of Great Britain.The experience of the host families in World War 2 is similar to that of the evacuees.The majority of the source is positive, as it explains what is to come because of the end of war.It is also a Primary source, written in 1945 at the very end of the war, before post-war celebrations such as VE (Victory in Europe) day.

Anyway, Waltz argued that good men behave badly in bad social organizations, and bad men can be stopped from behaving badly if they are in good social organizations.Even as it became increasingly apparent that Berlin was unlikely to provide a hot war, it provided the Cold War with its most conspicuous symbol, a regular stop for any visit to the city, a chance to stand and look over into a grey east and compare it with the wealth behind (John P. S. Gearson, K. Schake, 2002).The stand-off of Soviet and American tanks in the heart of Berlin in October 1961, constituted the most dangerous moment of the Cold War in Europe and it was one of the last major politico-military incidents of Cold War.The third one, even cannot distinguish which is g...

So many Men did not realise the consequences of War and how bad it really was, becuae of people like Jessie Pope lying about War.So overall the attitude of war had changed so much, at first people who wrote recruitment poems were seen as good people but now they are one the most hated people.In the poem she mentions about injuries, but not in a bad way, “who would rather come back wit a crutch” so hear she is trying to tell the readers that if they do go to war, they will only come back with a crutch, rather then a leg being blown off.After studying all about the war I learnt that war was very horrific and the promoters were very wrong.At first the poets were very optimistic and all had very good opinions of how good the war would be.

However, not all governments can be democratic and such states are likely to cause war since they selfish motives drive them.For neo-liberalists, violence and war are not located in the third level and in fact, they do not appear anywhere at all since social and political organization can eliminate the vices classified as bad behaviour.Neorealist conceptualize international anarchy because of social relations among sovereign nation states explaining it that bad people behave badly because of the bad social organizations while they could have been stopped from misbehaving if they were living in socially good organizations, which may lead to wars around the world.However, he found this inefficient since the theorists could not just agree o...

the glorified aspect of war, that all men are heroes, brave and .attitudes to war.who dealt with the consequences of war - the doctors and orderlies.the tent and during the “War!” – “the part that is not for show”, “a .allowed to show anything against war (“the part that is not for .

Maus is not meant to be a story that encompasses World War II or the Holocaust, but rather, a story about the life of his father, Vladek Spiegelman: I still want to draw the book about you…/The one I used to talk to you about…/About your life in Po... ... middle of paper ... ... but rather, that it was humanity itself which suffered.How would a sentence like, ‘the hero, who although he treats his wife in a derogatory manner, punched a bad guy to save a damsel in distress’ serve as a gauge of morals or justice?In a war there are good guys, bad guys, and everything imaginable in-between.Instead, they present the absolutes of good and evil in a simple and concise way so that we may be able to distinguish all of the many gradients that lie i...

Italy symbolized death, disaster, and the brutality of a war, while Switzerland represented peace, hope, and the comfort of safety from war.Rinaldi even told Henry that “this war is killing me, I am very depressed by it.” A major even told Henry “It has been bad.This is a good reason why Catherine and Henry decided to start their new life in the comfort of Switzerland.They knew there that them and the baby would be safe from the disasters related to the war.Here is where all of the war and fighting takes place throughout the novel.

The Vietnam War was courageously fought.“On the Issues: Vietnam War.” USA Today.In order to receive good things you have to go through some bad things.Overview: The Vietnam War.” .That is what is being fought for every day and in the Vietnam War.

I think nobody couldn’t stop a war because Hitler was already determined to have the war, so through appeasement, Britain reduced the period of World War II.During appeasement, Britain and other countries were starting to know more and more what Hitler really was wanting and they can have time to prepare a war for unexpected situation, it helped a lot when World War II actually happened.Maybe it looked like this ‘Britain did best for preventing the war, and Germany didn’t admit it.’ Therefore, I think it can be one reason that when the war started, many other countries with Britain fought against Germany.And in spite of all the bad effects, if we think over appeasement, it was better than had a war.So if Britain made a war, Britain shoul...

The Chinese philosopher Mencius states that humans are naturally good and that one’s circumstances influence their nature.Those who oppose Hobbes and say that humans are naturally good are, frankly, idealists.It is also unrealistic to think that one can make man good simply by means of education.At the opposite end of the philosophical spectrum, the anthropologist Ruth Benedict wrote that one’s culture and its social norm has the ability to mold that individual into a good or bad being.Hobbes also asks an interesting question to those who believe that human are good.

there is good and bad in both sides in the war.But Hollywood war film would over simplify complex situation in to a simple choice between good and evil: showing the USA as good and the enemy as bad, thus forcing audiences to support the USA in the war.There is good and bad in both sides in the war.He represents the macho man who has set out on a war and achieved the purpose and thus justifying war as a rite of passage.But the Hollywood war film would over simplify complex situation in to a simple choice between good and evil: showing the USA as good and the enemy as bad, thus forcing audiences to support the USA in the war.

They do not care the war, even who the leader is....gh at human start the war stupid because the war causes a lot of unfair, make many people died, and anyone involved the war have bad life.According to Peter Herborn “World War I was supposedly the ‘war to end all wars’, but it ushered in a century characterized by more destructive warfare” (67).Here is a question confusing all over the world—how to stop or change the war?The Chinese government is not the same partisan as now in that time, they have 3 years’ war between these two different partisan, and that war killed more than 10 million people!

During this time he made many decisions that could either be described as being reflective of a good or bad leader.He may not have been a good Marxist leader, but this was not the question at hand.The Brest-Litovsk treaty with Germany sealed their safety in World War 1 despite losing much land.Only a good leader would be able to remedy this.This policy however, was promptly dropped at the end of the war in favour of a more capitalist approach.

Whenever a war is occurring within a country the civilians are always at risk even if they are not directly in the line of fire.Does the good outweigh the bad?War is a very difficult topic to be completely correct in, so often times it is best to just be more correct, and the fact that the good aspects of drone strikes outweigh the bad aspects it provides a way for our military to be more correct.Many fear drone strikes because civilians have died in the attacks, but drone strikes in fact dramatically reduce the amount of civilian deaths that transpire through war.America’s Secret Drone War.

No one deserved what they got, good or bad” on page 2, column 1, line 13-19.Out from the action in the short story, we can see that the theme is “War”, because the story is during the war and the happening is an example of how civilians are treated by the soldiers.The message could also be that under war, nobody deserved what they got, good or bad, for what is a quote that Cabe uses twice (page 2, column 1, line 19 and page 2, column 2, last line).All the things a soldier or a civilian experience during war will become a scar for life.Some people believe that when a man is at war, the war changes the man forever.

Rather than speaking of the tragedies and ache of war, he spoke of it with pride.When speaking of war, for example, a politician cannot convince thousands to die by saying it plainly.In Churchill’s case, manipulation was good because the cause and results of it were both good.He used the words “right and freedom” and “honor” that evoke pride and emotion to describe war.Uniting the public through manipulation is solely a method to reach a goal, it is this goal that determines whether a politician should be deemed as good or bad.

It involved the same set of people who were fight for the same cause and wanted to achieve the same results.Reference: • Microsoft Encarta Dictionary 2008, “World War I”.To begin with, the issues that surrounded the war are one and the same.Apart from this, both wars was a scenario where the good guys are trying to stop the bad guys – the Allies being the good guys while Germany and their alliance being the bad guys.In the case of World War I and World War II, I hold the position that both of them are not two separate political events.

For example, the general conscription could mean a respectful nation with low crime rates, or a rebellious nation, with bad thoughts on authority figures.The outcome of the system, good or bad, depends on how the individual country carries it out.Bibliography .Meagan Ewing, 533 words .If, say, a war did break out, it would mean that they would not have to spend as much time recruiting because they would already have trained soldiers there, allowing them to have a head start in the battle side of war.

This is because John McCrae wanted to show the realities of war because his friend had died during the war, this meant that McCrae was determined to show the realities of war and not let people think that it was ‘easy’ or ‘fun’ as people said it was.In my opinion, ‘The Volunteer’ is a very good poem and is not biased because as well as saying the positive things about war, it also states the negative.This is also because McCrae is trying to show what war was really like and show the insensitive realities of war.Nevertheless, there are some poems such as ‘Into Battle’ that only state the positive points about war and even the bad aspects are described as something positive and are seen as propaganda.“Thou art my battle axe and weapons of ...

The gore of a violent war that Homer describes, depicts the suffering of warriors who had no better choice, because to reach glory and a higher stature in society this was what needed to be done.Beauty, ugliness, intelligence, foolishness, brutishness, humanity, courage, and cowardice are characteristics that Oriana Fallaci states that war brings out in a man.Throughout the poem the reader sees the good as well as the bad sides of war.Homer believes that a person that is unwilling to fight in a war is not worthy of any awards and not be honored in any way.At times it appeared that the warriors lived two different lives; war life and civilian life.

The website www.americancivilwar.com tells many good stories of women and there role in the Civil War era.Mind me remind you that it was not only white women who participated in the Civil War.An era in which the movie The Good, The Bad and The Ugly takes place in, an era in which women probably had as big as influence as men did.One cannot depend on media, music, literature or even less films like The Good, The Bad and The Ugly despite how good they are or politically correct they seem.American Civil War.

Back at refugees camps their we’re to people but not enough food or shelter for all them but me and my family did not going to the refugees camps because my grandfather’s bother was one of the leader of my family tribe Ogden so we stead with his and his soldiers they took good care of me my family till we get money to move to new country I was happy that was staying with my grandfather’s bother but I flat bad for the other people that we’re at the refugees camps because the refugees camps did not do anything people there where people still doing every day.Most of my family got sponsored by different country’s this was good and bad at same time because I know that we we’ir not going be in the same county that made sad as child to see my o...

People here in Pakistan don’t have good business knowledge and they don’t know which business could lead to greater income for them so lack of education is also the leading cause poverty in Pakistan.People here don’t feel bad about being corrupt, they don’t feel bad when public property is destroyed or when some one is a threat to country’s economy.Education standard is very poor in Pakistan due to poverty, people cant afford here to have good education only the elite class here has the access to good education.Poverty is obviously not a good thing it’s a sin.Pakistan has stepped into a war against terrorism because of poverty as one of its main reason.

In the shitfield one sees everything that is bad about the war.Tim O’Brien shows many of the negative sides of the war to the reader in ways that the reader can see how bad war is.“The Things They Carried as a Composite Novel.” War, Lit, and the .The awful memories of war stick with some of the men long after they return home from the war.He feels that war is a bad thing and wants to show the reader that it’s a terrible thing and he does this very well.

War is nasty; war is fun.This book is not just a war book, but a book about men’s feelings while they were away at war.That is how bad war scars some people.Big Meaning: This passage explains to the reader how the Vietnam War was a different kind of war.Passage: “War is hell, but that’s not the half of it, because war is also a mystery and terror and adventure and courage and discovery and holiness and pity and despair and longing and love.

War cannot teach it’s mistakes because war as a whole removes the personal aspect of warfare.Since we have conclude that the popular choice is to say that war is wrong suggests that people who desire to go to war, miss war, or idolize war are insane.Is “a good war is a war that teaches it’s mistakes without one having to live with them”, a response of hypocrisy.Lets again look at the question, “when does paradox become hypocrisy?” and compare it to the response, “a good war is a war that teaches it’s mistakes without one having to live with them.” In order to make the response true we would have to rephrase the question.This student asked, “When does paradox become hypocrisy?” Immediately afterwards I wrote the response, “A good war is a...

This novel takes place during a time of war and shows what war is like, realistically.For example, in Book III of the novel, the priest says that people that summer finally realized the war and that people were gentler because they had been beaten.The author shows us the characters interact with each other and how they deal with the war surrounding them.Hemingway shows the reader what war can do to a person.In Book III, Frederic shoots at a sergeant and thinks nothing of killing another human being because that’s what occurs in war.

By showing mostly the negative aspects of the war, people tend to overlook its purpose.As the war continues, more and more people are starting to oppose it, doubting the intentions of those who are pursuing it.Good, Bad News in Iraq Intelligence Estimate.By showing the prison conditions of the detainees, the people are more drawn to the cruelties of war, instead of thinking who these detainees were.Political leaders like US President George W. Bush attracted the opposition of the international community because of the US occupation of Iraq in relation to his war on terror.

After the war was over everyone including world leaders, respected him and his decisions however far fetched they seemed at the time.Historians are more likely to be critical of Churchill than the people at that time as they were just happy to have won the war and read of his exploits in the newspapers.His two bad sources come of the Naval war ships, .This and various other quotes from the paragraph, show that Churchill would not let his hard work and devotion to the war go unnoticed and wanted to make sure people heard about his accomplishments for many years to come.The Historians I reviewed were correct in some of the things they said, for instance, when they give the good and bad points of Churchill and not just a one-sided view.