War On Terror Essays

Terrorism is ‘a complex phenomena in which violence is used to obtain political power to readdress grievances ’ In order for one to consider the war on terrorism as an actual war, an actual statement of waging war has had to been made.Although this enemy is invisible, and the way of fighting the battles are different (due to the asymmetrical aspect of the war on terror) it does not mean this is not a war.” The war on terror could simply be a war against a ‘thing’ such as the war on poverty, drugs, crime tc… There is no real way to defeat, destroy and rid the planet of such immaterial concepts.On the streets of London, there is no such thing as a ‘war on terror’, just as there can be no such thing as a ‘war on drugs’ He continues by stati...

The main failure of the war on terror is that it is continuing.I believe that the war on terror could last for many years to come and even if it is successful, will have to happen again.The war on terror is still trying to enforce this but has no effect as of yet.In conclusion I would say that the war on terror is destined for failure because only one terrorist leader has been captured so far and many more are out there.Another failure of the war on terror is, from Source 21, “Death tolls – both military and civilian… ” shows that there are still potential terrorists, with potential leaders at large.

War on terror refers to the ongoing military campaign led by U.This marked the genesis of war on terror.International effort towards war on terror was then boosted.The essay explores on the topic understanding the war on terror by Patrick Coaty.Fighting the War on Terror War on terror is a global challenge.

It is a failure to identify the War on Terror in the same way the Cold War has been identified, since the first is fought on a new, rather obscure battleground that we do not yet fully understand against a highly decentralized enemy which is not embodied in any physical representative and works from within modern liberal society, against it.Toaldo, M. (2012), “The War on Terror and Its Cold War Burdens: An Assessment of the Reagan Legacy”, , June 20 , .However, even though these are significant arguments, there has been a significant rise of discourse that seeks to separate the War on Terror from other conflicts, including the Cold War, stating that it is a new kind of war which symbolises a profound social transformation in the conte...

Olivier Roy a New York Times columnist argues that the war on terror is “both a mirror of and a form of revenge against the globalization that has made them what they are”.Because Afghanistan is a legitimate war with widespread international support it will never be as damaging as Iraq was and the removal of Al Qaeda has been instrumental in the war on terror meaning the benefits will arguable outweigh any costs of the Invasion The nature of globalisation itself means that there will always be winners and losers resulting in a situation whereby there will always be those who are dissatisfied with the results, making the war on terror not the true cause for the on-going terrorism and has not had the effect that many people argue.So this b...

He further notes that ‘even if one were to grant that terrorism necessarily involves the killing of innocents, this alone does not place it beyond the scope of just war theory, for innocents may be killed in a just war.In his article Can Terrorism Be Justified, Valls criticises Walzer’s (1992) dismissal that terrorism may be justified and advocates that ‘on the most plausible account of the just war theory, taking into account the ultimate moral basis of its criteria, violence undertaken by non-state actors can, in principle, satisfy the requirements of a just war….It is upon this discrimination principle that Lowe, in his article ‘Terrorism and Just War Theory’ argues that just war theory doesn’t provide an appropriate analytical tool f...

The other issue is the inconsistent visions of politicians in relation to the war on terrorism and approaches to develop the war.In spite of the fact the war on terrorism is the priority of not only the US administration but also of the global community, the approaches to win the war should be chosen according to the principles of balance and justice.Although the question is rather controversial, and it is a challenge to assess this or that approach to overcoming the problem of the war on terrorism, it is important to concentrate on the clear idea that the war on terrorism should be developed, but with references to the effective methods.It is rather difficult to develop the effective policy in relation to the war on terrorism because te...

To win the war on global terrorism, the secretary also expressed the need for DOD to design new techniques to organize, train, and equip military personnel, the need to develop metrics to show if the U.S. was winning or losing the global war on terrorism, and the need to come up with a broad, integrated plan that could be employed to stop the next generation of terrorists (USA Today, 2005).In the memo addressed to a number of military and civilian personnel, Rumsfeld felt that the U.S. initiated war on terrorism was, at best, achieving mixed results.Such a mechanism will heighten the public’s perception about the global war on terrorism.Policy makers need to develop viable proposals that could be used to front an effective war on global ...

It is pertinent therefore, to question whether terrorism can be ethically assessed using the Just War tradition.In this essay, I will argue that it is possible to ethically evaluate terrorism by employing Just War principles.The Just War tradition has been seen as a leading perspective on the ethics of war since the writings of St Augustine were rearticulated by Thomas Aquinas.I will show that terrorists can satisfy the most important criterion of the Just War tradition.For a war to be just, numerous criteria must be satisfied within these categories.Walzer, Michael, (1992), ‘Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations’, (New York: Basic Books) .

(Stanley A., 2008)  Illinois senator stresses that strong counter terrorism policies should be in place so as to boost the war on terror, a view that is shared by his Arizona counterpart.Mc Cain, a former war hero and an expert on military and foreign issues sees the need to expand the Guatanamo bay prison for war terror suspects an idea which Barrack Obama vehemently opposes arguing this will only legitimize the republican evil thought of punishing some innocent civilians.Many of us believe that  terrorism war must be won if America must remain stable.According to Obama, all the options had not be exhausted and this war could have been avoided as Americans and Iraq people have only been exposed to more terror attacks.Financing the war o...

Conclusion It has been established that the war on terrorism has negatively affected the Muslim American community.It is worth noting that the threat posed on Muslim Americans by the war on terrorism is to be blamed for the reluctance by some members to fully commit to the faith to avoid harassment.War on terrorism War on terrorism is a concerted effort by nations led by the United States to identify and eliminate members of organized crime groups which are engaged in executing terrorist activities across the globe (Sides and Gross).It is worthy appreciating that the war on terrorism has so far only identified members of Islamic community as the cause of threat to the community.The war on terrorism also covers the economic dimensions of ...

Just War Against Terror: The Burden of American Power in a Violent World.A full-fledged war against terrorism and countries harboring terrorists has become inevitable.However, the war on Afghanistan and Iraq also revived the debate over the principles of the Just War Doctrine that exists for centuries.Just War theory believes in the principle of legitimate self-defense in the form of war.Many people question the policy of the Bush Doctrine citing the principles of Just War Doctrine.

Therefore, the act of waging a war upon another state has been sustained by him since 346 AD; first by Thomas Aquinas, via the ‘just war theory,’ long with the Catholic Church and the Protestants with the ruling bodies of that time.But what could be nailed out of all the misunderstandings and the impossibilities that the UN and other anti terrorism organizations have been trying to define is, that terrorism is any act which would destroy the world peace, which would even dissolve the idea of a ‘just war.’ In order to fight terrorism, international law should not issue a definition, but should try to harmonize one, and should rather use the common themes of violence, which are applicable to it, which alone can fight this unjustified terro...

I will cautiously handle the issue with one thing in mind that the war on terror will not be resolved with an overwhelming single blow but this war will demand international cooperation and extreme patience.Chasdi, R. (2002): Tapestry of Terror; A Portrait of Middle East Terrorism, 1994-1999.I would use the holistic approach in approaching the issue on war on terrorism.My approach to war on terror In the holistic approach to war on terror I would mainly focus on the 3Dapproach which entails diplomacy, defence and development in pursuit of security objectives of America as a country.It would be my duty as the president of the United States of America to ensure that war on terror is not misguided and I would take the holistic approach in a...

An example of state terrorism is the “dirty war” waged by Spanish state services against the Basque nationalist armed group ETA.Thus the objectives of an attack are above all to mark the spirits and not to offer a strategic advantage as during military operations of a conventional war.Terrorists claiming to be Islamist consider themselves fighters for God, waging a holy war (literal translation that only refers to the physical struggle included in the term Jihad, term with other meanings).During the Algerian war, the French services as The Red Hand carried out several hundred “homicidal actions” against FLN and OAS officials and their arms suppliers.All this implies and refers to a definition of war, to the law of war which imposes to sp...

War on Drugs = War on Terrorism???If you quit drugs, you join the fight against terror in America.” (peacecouncil.net) This is false because many of the illicit drugs being bought and consumed by the citizens of this country are being produced here in the U.S., so the purchase of these drugs cannot possibly be contributing to terrorism.The United States’ new claim in today’s world of propaganda and mind-warping media is that The War on Terrorism = The War on Drugs.The "War on Drugs and Terrorism": Madison Avenue Enlists.President Bush claims, "It's so important for Americans to know that the traffic in drugs finances the work of terror, sustaining terrorists, that terrorists use drug profits to fund their cells to commit acts of murder....

Indeed, there is no argument that the “War on Terror” has increased surveillance of the general population of specific groups and given the police more powers in their jurisdiction to fight against terrorist.After the September 11th attacks on the United States, the U.S. declared a “war on terror.” Within American people, it was economic insecurity that aroused the greatest anxiety among them, “So, first of all, let me assert my firm belief that the only thing we have to fear is fear itself – nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat into advance,” said President Franklin D. Roosevelt.The “War on Terror” has contributed to the growing abuse of human rights.The Israeli attacks on Palestini...

Fear of Bolsheviks in post-World War I turmoil, a deadly Wall Street bombing, and assassination threats in 1919 led to the “Palmer Raids”—round-ups of thousands of people around the country, mostly leftist or pro-labor, organized by J. Edgar Hoover under the authority of Attorney General A Mitchell Palmer.Human rights in the ‘War on Terror’.The Supreme Court swiftly ruled that this was an unconstitutional extension of the president’s war powers.During the Korean War, President Truman nationalized the steel industry in order to break a strike that threatened war production.More than a hundred-thousand Japanese-Americans were interned for the duration of World War II in a tragic overreaction to the Pearl Harbor attack, a move upheld by the...

Because of the nature of terrorism, military action alone is not likely to be enough to win a war against terrorism itself.Now we are really at war and are confronting a genuine national crisis because to war with international terrorism is to war with other countries.We are finding that it is an even more difficult task today to be at war with a concept like "international terrorism" because we also must give it a face.In the good old days, it seemed like such an easy task to identify and give a face to who were your friends and foes at time of war, even at the risk of racial and cultural stereotyping.The more foes that we draw into this war, the more complex will be the conduct of the war.

The underlying policy in the war in Iraq has been that “the war in Iraq is noble, necessary and fair”.Some political analysts say that it is ironical that the war on terrorism has led to increased terrorism activities in defiance and retaliation.What necessitated the war were the claims by the Bush administration that the government of Sadam Hussein was supporting terror groups and terrorism activities.This is very important in that abrupt withdrawal of troops could throw to waste all the efforts made in stabilizing the region and eventually winning the war on terror.The future of Iraq The unprecedented length in the Iraq war has called for reevaluation of strategies used in the war.

During the Civil War, Baron Wrangel, a White leader in the Crimea ordered the execution of 300 prisoners of war, while the Green leader Antonov allowed his army of peasants to bury alive captured communist.This policy involved “emergency measures” that were imposed on Lenin as production fell and the Civil War started, Lenin had no intention of using the economy to establish personal power as he was willing to grant back political freedom as soon as the Civil War was over.The interpretation that War Communism was dictatorial is also questionable because, to an extent, the control of War Communism was needed, as most factory committees were not professional and experienced enough to control production for the Civil War, nor did they have ...

Particularly, from late November 2001, the detention, treatment and proposed prosecution of the detainees taken in the “war on terror” and held at US Naval base Guantanamo Bay became the subject of major international disputes.Michael Howard, Professor of the History of War at Oxford University, thinks that “to declare war on terrorists or, even more illiterately, on terrorism is at once to accord terrorists a status and dignity that they seek and that they do not deserve.Given the above-mentioned arguments concerning the scope of application of the law of war to “war on terror”, it is reasonable to argue that neither Taliban nor al Qaeda reserve the right to be treated as legitimate subjects within the legal framework of International l...

The United Kingdom has been allies with the United States since time immemorial, and both of the countries embark in this so called war on terror.While a lot of criticisms have shaken the very foundation of the said war because of reported human right’s abuses done by some US soldiers, the whole idea of war on terror should not be dropped.cms > Britain Drops ‘War on Terror’ Label, military.“The War on Terror (also known as the War on Terrorism) is a campaign initiated by the United States government under President George W. .The term war on terror was dropped by the UK government through Sir Ken McDonald, the country’s chief prosecutor on December 27, 2007.

As the war on terrorism continues, the means of terrorists in fulfilling their tasks are increasing and expanding just as much as the growth of their membership.After the major world wars, civil wars ensued within countries especially those which are left torn by the Cold War.The usage of kamikaze has been used especially at the height of the Pacific war where Japanese pilots crashed their fighter planes into the enemies’ largest warships to further incapacitate its advantage for battle.The targets became the embassies of foreign states which have been participating in the civil war as either allies or peacekeeping forces (Hafez, p. 7).This form of suicide attacks is determine as the tactical kind of suicide (Battin, 2005, p. 241) but it...

Journalism And The War on Terrorism.A hazardous profession: War, journalists, and psychopathology.Feinstein, Owen, & Blair measured the emotional impact of reporting war on journalists and concluded that war journalists suffered from higher extent of depression and PTSD than their fellow traders who did not report on war events.Under the political pressure of the United States and its coalitions in “war on terror”, journalists are facing great difficulty in reporting events since the government used the so-called “war on terrorism” to expand its scope of investigation and to restrict press freedom and other civil rights.As a response, the Bush Administration implemented the “war on terror” program immediately after the attack and int...

On September 20, 2001, in a joint session of Congress, President George W. Bush spoke of a new war when he said, "Our war on terror begins with al-Qaida [the terrorist group founded in Afghanistan by Usama Bin Ladin in the late 1980s], but it does not end there."Coercion and Its Fallout."Sidman, Murray.It will not end until every terrorist group of global reach has been found, stopped, and defeated" (Bush Announces Start of a "War on Terror").In the war against terrorism, it is, unfortunately, nearly impossible to beco... .

In reaction to this, President Bush and his predominantly Neo-conservative government decided to engage in a ‘war on terror’.The outcome of the Iraq conflict and the war on terror will be a barometer for Bush’s long-term legacy.Once the ‘war on terror’ concludes, preventing terrorism will remain an important goal of the U.S and the international community, but it will no longer be the main focus or driver of U.S foreign policy.There are many sides to America’s war on terror.Democrats have argued that Bush’s approach to the war on terror has created more terrorists then it has eliminated, and that it will continue to do so unless the U.S changes its outlook.

Friends and families have lost their loved ones to the ravages of war.These are some of the questions whose answers are expected to bringing meaning to the families who have continued to offer their strength to the fighters of the war.The Amnesty International in 2003 charged the war on terrorism by stating that it has made the world more unsafe through curtailing the rights of human beings, while looking down upon the rule of the international law and covering governments from possible scrutiny.In conclusion, war on terrorism has created divisions amongst people from different origins and faiths and sowing more conflict.A study conducted by Anup Shah proves that while America could be on the verge of winning terrorism war, the absence o...

[13] Ignatieff, M. (2002): “Human Rights, the Laws of War, and Terrorism, journal of Social Research, pp.[9] Ignatieff, M. (2002): Human Rights, the Laws of War, and Terrorism, journal of Social Research, pp.[2] Ignatieff, M. (2002): “Human Rights, the Laws of War, and Terrorism, journal of Social Research, pp.[17] Steinfels, P. (2004): The Brutality of War, and the Innocents Lost in the Crossfire, New York Times, 20th November 2004 .Taking a case study of the US involvement in the Israeli-Palestinian war, the US was not involved in the war to prevent aggression; instead, it was trying to help Israel protect its sovereignty.

Increasing tensions between Israel and its Arab neighbors was the main cause of the mid 1960s Six Day War; especially Arabs were angered by the strategy of Israel of water diversion from the Jordan River to the Negev Desert.The Israelis at that time as a war can boost the economy by bringing in foreign money and also can distract people’s minds from low growth and unemployment.Roger Burbach, BenClarke, (2002), September 11 and the U.S. War: .The Balfour declaration was called for the establishment of a ‘Jewish home in Palestine’[9].Balfour declaration was made in 1917 by the British Government to deal with the divisions of its territory after the end of the First World War which supported the Zionists ideas of establishing their territ...