Warren Abortion Essays

On the one hand, some people feel that abortion should be legal because a woman has a right to choose whether she wants to continue a pregnancy or not.Mary Anne Warren has written a very detailed and understandable article, however, her claims are not consistent or convincing and may seem a bit heartless, but nonetheless she presents them concisely with charisma, keeping the reader on a philosophical seesaw, anxiously agreeing and disagreeing throughout her piece.Yet, she does criticize those who defend abortion as the right to control one's body, "…it would be very odd to describe, say, breaking a leg, as damaging one's property, and much more appropriate to describe it as injuring oneself" (Warren, 314).Judith Thomson, according to War...

I do not know of many people that would agree to this, even Mary Ann Warren herself.Although many people have different views, Mary Ann Warren does hold the view of Ultra-Liberal.Baltimore, MD: The Williams & Wilkins Company Warren, Mary Ann.The third view is the “Ultra-Liberal position”, which is the view that Mary Ann Warren wishes to provide support for in her article, “Abortion is Morally Permissible.The first view of abortion is a called, “Ultra-Conservative”, which state regardless of the reason, having an abortion is immoral.

Beginning with Marry Anne Warren and her article “On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion,” she states “Women who are poor, under-age, disabled, or otherwise vulnerable, suffer most from the absence of safe and legal abortion.” (Warren 112).Which was a very engaging, because it is true, not everyone sees abortion the same way.Mary Anne Warren states that abortion, “may be defined as the act a woman performs in deliberately terminating her pregnancy before it comes to term, or in allowing another person to terminate it” (112).If a mother cannot raise the child, then abortion should not be the automatic solution, because there are many people out there that wish they could have a child of their own and sadly, they can’t.Abortion has been...

For Mary Warren and Judith Thomson they both agree that the fetal is a full human being and it not right to kill the baby.Abortion is not the right idea to end the live of the fetal before he sees the light.In my paper I would like to share with you what I think of abortion and how it affects our live.I agree with Warren “The deliberate killing of viable newborns is virtually never justified This is in part because neonates are so very close to being persons that to kill them requires a very strong moral justification as does the killing of dolphins, whales, chimpanzees, and other highly person like creatures.Warren admits a fetus might have some rights because the mothers have the right to think of her body and diced if she wants to hav...

Warren’s arguments are valid, mostly sound, and cover just about all aspects of the overall topic.Warren insists that the “moral” sense of human and “genetic” sense of human must be kept separate in this observation.Biomedical Ethics 4th (1996): 434-440.However much she was inconsistent on the topic of infanticide, her overall writing was well done and consistent.I personally agree with her arguments on these topics as I agree that women should be allowed to have abortions on their own terms, without subjection of authority or society telling her what she can and cannot do, as well as I agree for the most part on her view of what a person is, potential personhood not outweighing the choice of abortion, and her reasoning on what defines a...

html Singer, P. , (1999), Practical Ethics, Cambridge University Press 2nd Edition, ISBN-10: 052143971X Tooley, M. (1983), Abortion and Infanticide, Oxford: Oxford University Press, Cited in [Warren, 1973] Warren, M. A. , (1973), On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion, The Monist, LaSalle, Illinois, Vol.He appears to be less concerned about infanticide or abortion and his theory is that of great moral good.This single criterion [Warren, 1973] which distinguishes between those who have intrinsic property rights and those who do not is in itself a dilemma.[Warren, 1973] cites an actual example when an irresponsible pregnant woman was charged for negligent homicide as she failed to observe the precautions and suffered a miscarriage.Warre...

Therefore, it can be argued that a sleeping adult also does not show these traits of being a person; hence, they can be killed while they are asleep.Secondly, Warren argues that moral accountability should be the basis of personhood.Firstly, Warren argues that even on the surmise that a fetus has a strong right to life, abortion can still be seen as morally permissible.The morality of abortion cannot be proved, but sometimes it is necessary to have them for different reasons.Meanwhile, a full grown adult should not abort a fetus simply to restore ease in their lives.

Warren believes that prior to a certain point in a pregnancy, the child does not have “the capacity to understand” the ramifications of what an abortion would be, therefore the abortion does not infringe upon the rights of the unborn fetus.Warren’s main criteria for what makes a person will be considered first, then we will move on to her argument on sentience, and the differences she notes between a fetus and an infant.Warren does not raise the answers to already obvious arguments when considering these ...Before that time, the fetus does not have the sentience that would make it a person.She states that: “…in the ways that matter from a moral point of view, human fetuses are very unlike human persons, particularly in their early months...

(Warren – “Moral Status” 75) Warren argues that a fetus has not yet reached a point where it can be called a person and therefore aborting it is not deeply tragic.Warren explains this in her book, Moral Status: Obligations to Persons and Other Living Things, when she says that an embryo or a fetus is not like a born child who has a moral status like other adult human beings who have one or all of the characteristics mentioned above.Warren accepts the fact that a seven-month old fetus can already feel the pain and respond to light stimuli.Warren, Mary Anne.(Warren – “On the Moral and Legal” 10) But as it grows, a fetus can have a stronger right to life.

The analogy showed, if the reader instinctively replied that it was morally acceptable to unplug the violinist, then they should also agree that in some cases abortion is permissible; so logically it has also to be true that abortion is permissible in all cases as Marquis’s theory illustrates.Speculatively, if Thomson were to reply directly to Warren she might claim, well if (x) consented to sex and took the relevant precautions, the precaution illustrates that she does not commit to the consequences of an action (y), if (y) appears out of a contraceptive mishap, (x) still has a moral right to her own autonomy.As Warren pointed out Thomson’s analogy did not show an analogy to consensual sex but did the analogy really fail?Jennifer in ‘Ph...

Many arguments in the abortion debate assume that the morality of abortion depends upon the moral status of the foetus.Wilson, K. (2012) Abortion Bans Premised on Fetal Pain Capacity.(1973) 'On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion', Monist, vol.Given the multiple facets requiring consideration, I assert that utilitarianism (Mill 1863) offers a coherent framework for weighing and comparing the inputs across a variety of situations, which can determine whether it is ever morally justifiable to have an abortion.There are other key issues requiring attention, such as the moral status and interests of the pregnant woman who may desire an abortion, and importantly, the likely consequences of aborting or not aborting a particular foetus.

The Court’s verdict also permitted abortion after viability for those cases, where abortion becomes necessary to protect a woman’s health.Following Warren, if she would have been provided with a “justified medical death sentence” even with the consent of her parents, it could not be termed anything less than killing.[10] Warren, Mary Ann, “On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion”.Abortion is not supported by two of the primary postulates – Continuation of human species through reproduction (implies no abortion, contraception or homosexuality) and self preservation and preservation of the innocent (implies no abortion).Warren moves further to justify her claim when she justifies even infanticide as morally acceptable under certain circu...

Warren justifies that the five qualities are sufficient criteria of determining the apparent “personhood” of a being by stating that such principles of humanity would be used when attempting to study alien life forms on distant planets.Mary Anne Warren’s “On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion” describes her justification that abortion is not a fundamentally wrong action for a mother to undertake.New York, New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.By forming a distinction between being genetically human and being a fully developed “person” and member of the “moral community” that encompasses humanity, Warren argues that it must be proven that fetuses are human beings in the morally relevant sense in order for their termination to be con...

The fact that women will continue to seek abortion procedures, even when no safe and legal abortion procedures are available means that women are willing to cause significant bodily risk to themselves to have an abortion.Despite abortion being a highly controversial and divisive public policy issue, medical abortion is a highly feasible and healthy alternative to other, illicit abortion procedures and the availability of medical abortion should, consequently, be maximized rather than restricted.The report by the World Health Organization on the rates of abortion in countries that impose strict abortion laws and those that have not shows that when countries tighten their restrictions on abortion the actual rates of abortion tend not to de...

Since I am an Epicureanist, I believe each woman should be given the means by which they can get a safe, legal abortion if they so choose.Women who are desperate enough to seek out an abortion are not going to abandon the idea simply because the government has declared it illegal.To accomplish this definition, Warren lists five major criteria she believes are most central to the concept of personhood.The health of women cannot be put in jeopardy simply because a few bureaucrats have a moral dilemma with abortion.In his article "Abortion and Infanticide", Michael Tooley tackles two important questions about abortion.

In conclusion, there are very few differences in view on abortion, from a moral and religious perspective, and both points of view consider abortion as an unacceptable action, unless the reason for doing it produces the least pain or is the best moral outcome.The philosopher Mary Ann Warren suggests a being need not exhibit all of these criteria to qualify as a person with a right to life, but if a being exhibits none of them (or perhaps only one), then it is certainly not a person.In light of grave or socio-economic circumstances, the Methodist Church believes in the right of the mother to choose whether to have an abortion, and is thus often regarded as pro-choice.This concludes that as the foetus satisfies only one criterion, consciou...

Legal action begins in Texas in March 1970, Norma McCorvey challenges Texas law banning the practice of abortion.The Court ruled, by seven votes to two, that the right to privacy under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution extended to a woman's decision to have an abortion, but that this right must be balanced against the interests of the state in regulating abortion: protecting women's health and protecting the potential of human life.McCorvey presents himself as a victim of his ambitious lawyer Sarah Weddington who allegedly used her to challenge Texas state law banning abortion.The majority opinion is written by Harry Blackmun, joined by President of the Court Warren E. Burger and Justice...

Briefly explain each type of policy, and explain why libertarians are philosophically opposed to them.Submission Guidelines Include your name and the assignment name (Homework Assignment 1) in the text of the document Include your name and the assignment name (Homework Assignment 1) in the name of the file that you submit.Identify and explain the two objections that Michael Sandel raises about Jeremy Bentham’s philosophy of Utilitarianism.What are the three types of policies and laws that Michael Sandel identifies as being commonly rejected by libertarians?Judith Jarvis Thomson (in “A Defense of Abortion”) makes an argument about the morality of abortion when the pregnancy is due to rape by creating a fictitious example about being hooke...

For example, “the mortality rate related to induced abortion was 0.6 deaths per 100,000 abortions in the years 1998 to 2005”, which is after legalization of abortion in the United States.In the two decades before Roe v. Wade, it has been “estimated that 200,000 to 1.2 million women sought out illegal abortions with approximately 5,000 women, resulting in death” due to dangerous abortion procedures performed by underground abortion clinics.This clearly indicates that abortion should not be restricted nor banned because if it was, women in desperation would have an abortion illegally, which can be extremely dangerous and could lead to injury or death of the mother.Legalizing abortion will allow women to receive proper care and a safe abort...

The public debate of the mental health risk of abortion can be traced back to 1987 when President Reagan asked the Surgeon General Koop to report on the psychological and physical effects of abortion.Abortion and anxiety: What's the relationship?.Warren, J. T., Harvey, S., & Henderson, J. T. (2010).The Surgeon General in his letter to the President also stated that the individual cases could not allow him to come to a scientific conclusion but felt that it was clear to him that the psychological effects of abortion are very small from the public health perspective.Koop did not report on the physical effects of abortion because the obstetricians and gynecologist had already concluded that there was no difference in the women who had h...

23 Sprang and Neerhof, "Banning Abortions," 745.Specifically, I will examine two common pro-abortion arguments made by Mary Anne Warren and Judith Jarvis Thomson and demonstrate that they cannot stand up to rational scrutiny and therefore fail to justify abortion.In this brief essay, I shall attempt to clear away some of the confusion present in typical abortion debates by cooling the rhetoric with reason enlightened by scientific facts.25 One might object that "abortion is morally neutral" is another possibility, but that which is morally neutral is morally permissible.The discussion received a new impetus at the release of the controversial abortion drug RU-486, "a pill to increase access to abortions and let women get them privately f...

The most damaging and traumatizing method of abortion is Dilation and Extraction.Although many people argue that free access to abortion services helps to keep unwanted births at minimum, abortions have a much greater negative effect on society because it is murder to an innocent child, it is stated to be wrong in the Bible, it is a health risk to the mother, and it is emotionally and physically degrading after the procedure.Every time an abortion is performed, an innocent child is murdered.In the Bible, abortion is said to be wrong, even though it doesn’t condemn abortion specifically, it still condemns all killing of humans when it says “Thou shalt not kill.” (Exodus 20:13) Abortion not only effects the baby, but it can cause serious h...

However, Thomson writes that when an abortion is performed after voluntary intercourse, the woman is therefore partly responsible for the foetus’s existence, meaning an abortion would be morally wrong.Warren (1973) claims it is arbitrary to have a specific line where an infant can be killed, and therefore it can be concluded that a foetus is a human from the moment of conception.‘… wants the abortion just to avoid the nuisance of postponing a trip abroad.” Many argue that the idea of moral indecency is too indistinct to be of any use; however Thomson has strongly claimed that arguing the issue of rights with regard to abortion is too unhinged, and that the concept of character proves essential to the debate on abortion.It is clear throug...

Warren specifically attacks premise 2 (Fetuses are innocent human beings.)This causes a problem when a real life case, such as Dax Cowart’s, and supporters of certain cases of active voluntary euthanasia, such as Philippa Foot, go against her view.After that, Warren lays out specific criteria that must be met to be a member of the moral community.This can then cause those who agree with Warren’s limited view to act in ways that can infringe the justice or charity of others.This was evident in the case of active nonvoluntary euthanasia for a person in a persistent vegetative state, who through Warren’s view could be actively euthanized because of their lack of moral personhood.

Some of the most common arguments abortion supporters use when confronting abortion opponents is when does a life begin?The question then becomes how is it determined how abortion can be morally right or wrong if it cannot be determined when the essence of personhood begins, and is abortion in fact murder (Warren)?Several African-American leaders denounced legal abortion as “genocide” and suggested that easy access to abortion would ultimately be used by whites to limit societal responsibility to care for children born into poverty.Many cultural and religious conservatives opposed legal abortion because legal abortion was thought to encourage sexual promiscuity by reducing the risks of sexual activity outside of marriage.For example, one...

If the mother’s happiness would be greater is she had an abortion, then abortion would be the right course of action.Her father’s request for an abortion was denied because the only moral and legal grounds for abortion would have been if her life were at grave risk.Many Christians accept abortion in order to save the life of the mother, or in the case of a severe deformity, but others argue that a person born with a deformity can still give and receive love as a human being and that the detection of such defects should not be grounds for an abortion.The key ethical dimension in the abortion debate is whether there should be an absolutist prohibition of abortion on the basis of divine law, natural law or human rights or whether there are ...

...s is a person.A U.S. citizen's "right to privacy" was first discussed in an 1890 Harvard Law Review article in which two Boston lawyers, Louis Brandeis and Samuel Warren, defined it as "the right to be let alone."Instead, it would protect citizens from intrusions into all parts of their lives.Abortion and the Privacy Amendment .This would not be an abortion amendment.

However this argument has no affect on the argument towards abortion.For example, my friend Jane chose to abort her child secretly.Since no one loses their loved one, abortion is morally permissible.The mother chose to get the abortion.Thesis: Abortion is morally permissible in which a fetus is not a person which deprives the fetus to its right to life, circular reasoning is an ineffective to oppose abortion, abortion only risks the fetus not society, and deprivation from a fetus’s future and suffering of a loved one has no affect on the argument towards anti-abortion.

Abortion deals with one's private life and should have nothing to do with the government.Regardless of the fact of morals, a woman has the right to privacy and choice to abort her fetus.The people that hold a "pro-life" view argue that a woman who has an abortion is killing a child.Although there are some restrictions on abortion, due to the states' rights, it is still ultimately the woman's choice.Abortion is one of the most controversial issues in the world today.

They say that when a women goes to get an abortion the fetus is given no choice.A women may not have enough money for an alley-way abortion and would then have to carry their pregnancy to term.A philosopher, Mary Anne Warren, proposed that consciousness, reasoning, self-motivated activity, and self awareness are factors that determine 'person-hood'.Pro-lifers may say to all of these arguments that any of these situations would be preferable to abortion.Radical pro-lifers fight for the lives of children and then go and destroy the lives of abortion doctors.