Ways To End An Argumentative Essays

The Five Ways of the Summa Theologica was written by St. Thomas Aquinas.So if God were to show us the way to the end, how can the two parties reach the same ending, one with guidance and one without?There are plenty of people in the world who do not believe in the existence of God and they are not immortal, their lives still come to an end.The fifth and final argument that Aquinas presents is that all beings are on a path and lack the knowledge of that path.What this argument fails to describe is the idea of what is greater than God.

This is achieved by the use of a subtle “hook sentence” at the end of the paragraph; this is a sentence that “hooks” into the new topic of the next paragraph.Look at the words you have used that end in “s”.A good argument is based, therefore, mainly on reason (even if this is passionately – even emotionally – conveyed); persuasion tends to be a more one-sided, personal and emotional conviction that only one way is the right way.End as you began – in a powerful, interesting and memorable way.You are failing to recognise where the end of the sentence should have been.

way it is today.Unlike the cosmological argument, the Design Argument .Another statement, which would support the Design Argument, is the .Aquinas's version of the argument relies on a very strong claim that .or process towards its end.

We can figure from his argument that Maggie’s decision was morally acceptable.The way Maggie’s death was executed was not ethically acceptable, based on Kant’s principles.Maggie’s decision was not ethically permissible because she violated Kant’s categorical imperative “Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of any other, never merely as a means to an end, but always at the same time as an end” by asking her trainer, Frankie Dunn, to kill her.James Rachels’ argument on euthanasia does not render Maggie’s Fitzgerald’s decision to die, ethically acceptable.By the argument of James Rachels, Maggie’s decision to die was indeed, not ethically acceptable.

In the same way things in the universe fit together suggests a designer.The Aesthetic Argument also produced by Tennant is based on the beauty in the world.He also says that the universe was designed in a way that the evolutionary process would create an environment in which intelligent life could exist instead of creating a chaotic universe.It originated from the greek word ‘telos’ which means ‘end’.William Paley had an argument that a watch was a complex piece of machinery made by an intelligent designer even if we don’t understand its purpose.

These issues still interest philosophers and scientists today.A simpler way to explain this would be to say that if the first half of the semester takes a certain amount of time, and time always passes at the same rate, then the second half of the semester will also take a certain amount of time, which can be measured.The problem with both Zeno's argument and yours is that neither of you deal with adding the infinite.His argument against motion is characterized by two famous illustrations: the flying arrow, and the runner in the race.infinitely at the same rate, then eventually they will equal a certain number, not infinity as both Zeno's argument and yours suggest.

Buddha made the Fourth Nobles Truths, Eightfold Path, and the law of karma An argument must be true to be a sound argument.Most people argue that some premises aren’t true in the Four Noble Truths because some believe you cannot change your ways of self-centeredness if you’ve been living that way for years.In reality everyone can change their ways and attitude for the greater good.The Four Noble Truths written by Buddha is a valid argument because all premises are true, the argument is reasonable and the premises lead to the conclusion.We can all end suffering.

It further stated that euthanasia blotted onto this inherent character; that the provision of a choice to end life gave people the reason to end life; that giving patients, their families, and the doctors an easy route out of the situation gave them the authority to take this easy route out as well.It takes the patient and/or his family into a higher level of decision-making whereby they choose whether to prolong the patient’s illness and let live or end the suffering and let the patient die in peace.The doctors can suggest this graceful exit option to the patient or the family but if the patient or the family’s will to live or let live is stronger than the will to end everything, euthanasia becomes out of the options and medication can ...

Just like Paley and Aquinas, Arthur Brown agrees with the design argument.He based his theory on his bow and arrow analogy, “Now what ever locks knowledge cannot move towards an end, unless it be directed by some being endowed with knowledge and intelligence; as the arrow is directed by the anchor”.He used a form of the teleological argument in his fifth way, in which he was arguing from the Design qua Regularity.He thinks it is entirely possible that you can imagine a chaotic universe, in which there are no rules, however, it is proven not to be chaotic and it was designed in such a way as to evolutionarily produce intelligent life.William Paley wrote a book called ‘Natural Theology’ and he mentioned his own form of the Teleological arg...

You can't win an argument .And when he does, you end up not only wrong, but also .guaranteed a strong argument and the avoidance of an ugly situation.However, if the truth does eventually get out you may end .In a multi-sided argument, an argument which is not .

The end statement is that the universe has a cause and that cause is god.Before we answer this question we must look at the weaknesses of the argument.The fist way is the argument from the fact of change to a prime mover; everything in the world is in motion and so had to have been moved by something, nothing can move by itself without something else exerting a force on it.The role of god in the cosmological argument can also be replaced with the big bang.Aquinas had three main ways of proving divine existence.

By looking at the eye, and the way in which it enables us to have vision, he said that this must also have had a designer, because it is as complex, if not more complex than the watch.He presented his argument in the form of a simple analogy.The argument is an inductive one, as its reasoning can give way to many conclusions, and because it is based on experience it is measurable and artificial.Derived from the Greek word ‘telos’ meaning end or purpose, it is an a posteriori argument, because it is based on experience, not on reason or revelation, using the surroundings of the world as supporting evidence.The second part of Paley’s argument is design qua regularity.

These three ways are .reason, and the way that they are set for a reason shows evidence of .Design qua Purpose says that the way things work for a specific .Tennant also developed the Aesthetic Argument.design argument.

In this essay I will be arguing that if we follow the categorical imperative it is immoral to sacrifice a life because it involves treating humanity merely as a means to an end.I will examine John Hardwig’s counter argument that we should end our own lives if more pain and suffering is caused by prolonging it/living it even if we are no longer a rational being.Take a different situation; Is a terminally ill person-needing 24/7 care, who is entirely financially reliant- only using their family as a means to an end?Here Kant seems to be suggesting that suicide isn’t a natural path of life; that it goes against our purpose and that it’s a contradiction to end your life when your goal would be to have an enjoyable life.There is surely an obv...

There is more evidence for the big bang then there is for any of the cosmological argument.The third way is the argument from contingent beings to a necessary being.Leibniz also offers an argument against the third theory of Aquinas, it says above that we are contingent beings and god being the only necessary being.The end statement is that the universe has a cause and that cause is god.The third argument is known as the Kalam argument as way put forward by two Muslim philosophers called al-Kindi and al-Ghazali.

You must include a minimum of three quotes from the story to craft your argument.* Must include at least one (1) example of polysyndeton and one (1) of asyndeton * Must include at least two (2) examples EACH of ethos, logos, and pathos * Must be organized in a manner that is coherent and supports your argument * Have a clear beginning, middle, and end to the speech .* Rule of Length: Juries are easily bored, so keep your closing remarks to between 2-3 minutes in length.* Does my conclusion wrap up my argument in an effective way?* Is there a clear beginning, middle, and end to my essay?

In this essay I will attempt to show how Descartes’s dreaming argument and evil demon argument justifies global scepticism and which of the two is a stronger and more convincing argument.This shows that the evil demon argument can be justified and is stronger than that of the dreaming argument.The argument implies that we cannot trust our own perceptions at any time because either way, we are constantly deceived, whether we are aware of it or not.It is likely that the evil demon does not exist, due to the fact that even though Descartes came up with the evil demon argument, he himself did not believe in its actual existence.Like the evil demon argument, the dreaming argument also states that we are being deceived into believing what we k...

Bauer’s argument shows no evidence the movie industry used the word “retard” in a hurtful way.Bauer’s argument was mostly a lot of finger pointing at the movie industry and their lack of compassion when using the word “retard.” Furthermore, the writer expresses society’s lack of compassion for the intellectually disabled community.Bauer’s argument to end the derogatory use of the word “retard” was ineffective due to the lack of organization and structure; it was based solely on an emotional standpoint and invalid evidence to prove her argument.In the end, the reader was unable to identify what the writer’s goal is, making this argument ineffective.Bauer’s argument is based on emotion which makes it hard for the reader to follow.

It is my belief that Rachels’ example is incongruous, that his moral point of view is unrelated to the context of the argument for passive nonvoluntary euthanasia, and therefore not an objection to my arguments at all.And morally acceptable to end life under such circumstances.It is of course not and is the author belief that in only two circumstances, outline above, that life ever be supported to end.The essence of the argument that there is a difference between active euthanasia and knowingly shortening a patient’s life as a side effect of treating their suffering is intention.I think this way for two reasons.

Walzer defines a ‘just war’ as a ‘limited war,’ and that just wars are governed by a set of rules, designed to prevent, as much as possible, "the use of violence and coercion against non-combatant populations" (Walzer XVII); On the other hand, a limited war attempts to establish the way things were prior to the aggression taking place.This book offers a sane way of perceiving morality within the insanity of war.Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations.He proceeds to discuss in a greater detail the ways that war has been perceived and how this impacts the topics of war and morality, and in doing so, he provides an intelligently structured and persuasive argument that can be viewed within a moral context.The lim...

The major way that the author uses ethos is through the style of their writing, it’s very academically put together and very formally, which not a lot of essays on this subject on the internet are.This fallacy is extremely weak in any sort of intellectual debate because the tactic of it is to fly off into a many other situations that are, more often than not, ridiculous and do not usually relate specifically to the “top of the slope” issue, and this essay is a good argument showing the flaws in the slippery slope argument against legalizing gay marriage.The author made solid, valid, and most importantly, logical points to break down the other argument showing how ridiculous it really was to try and use the “slippery slope” style.Usually,...

The cosmological argument is actually not one argument but a type of argument.The teleological argument suggests that, given this premise, the existence of a designer can be assumed, typically presented as God.The fourth proof about the existence of goodness or good things is called the moral argument.The third way is the most complicated of the Five Ways, God is the necessary of our being existence.This argument is supporting the existence of God, it argues that God is the best and is the only explanation for morality.

He concludes his argument by stating that in the afterlife, Socrates will have “all this to offer as [his] defense to the authorities there” (54b).The first argument presented is the fact that the majority will look down upon Crito and others for not preventing Socrates death; they will find it to be a “shameful thing both for you and for us” because it seems “that [Crito] let the opportunity slip because of some vice, such as cowardice” (46a).He further explains through his use of the Laws that violating the contract of the city (his “deeds” within it [52d]) is only going to undermine the laws in such a way that he would indeed be held to his original charges of corruption (53c).Perhaps if Socrates resisted, he could have changed the un...

Many lawyers, politicians, and great speakers use evidence, policies, and facts from the past to support or justify their present argument.Understanding perspectives is a very humbling and challenging way to argue.everthing’s an argument.The book, everything’s an argument provides a clear answer to this paradox, “the point of argument is to discover some version of the truth, using evidence and reasons…The aim of persuasion is to change a point of view, or to move others from conviction to action.With a foundation of truth and understanding, an argument can be valued in its ability to provide convincing evidence and information.

His arguments based on this conclusion that wealthy states lack happiness and that they may not achieve the good life is the fact that these states end up in war most of the time because of the scramble for the resources it has.In their search of pleasure, they end up being distracted from living the good life.These sentiments based on achieving the good life are as well echoed by Aristotle in his argument on the achievement of the good life (Hallman, p92).In his argument concerning the good life, Plato argues that an individual in society who tends to live the good life is one who is truly happy in his life.This is because they tend to seek pleasure in the wrong ways and places.

However, the idea of the universe just being here, a brute fact, a product of blind chance and nothing more is a personally unsatisfactory one due to the extraordinary nature of the universe and so whist the Design Argument may not conclusively prove the existence of God it suggests that the existence of a Designer, who we know as God, is a more probable likelihood than not.Science strengthens the design argument as it shows us more and more information about the universe.The basic and fundamental proposal of the design argument is that because of the apparent order that is present in the Universe and on earth, we must conclude that there is an element of design involved.There is also order and regularity in the universe, for example the...

...les often lead to true conclusions about matters of fact; therefore, common sense regards this as a good reason for trusting inductive rules in the future, if precautions are taken against error.He also discusses complex ideas, fantasy and fiction is possible to break down to simpler ideas, the copy of impressions; the unicorn is the copy of impressions of a horse and a horn of rhinoceros that both are earlier experienced.Here, it seems that he confused the act of conceiving with the content of represented object but the first argument looks logically consistent; however, there is a problem with it, since he ends up bring up God and Spirit as the thinking objects possible to exist unperceived in external world; he might have raises th...

In contrast, supporters of physician assisted suicide feel that the slippery slope argument is an exaggeration.Ironically, these people say that assisted suicide actually instills hope in people because they feel they have a way of controlling their life if it becomes too unbearable.Therefore advocates of this theory feel that the best way to prevent the establishment of involuntary euthanasia is by barring assisted suicide.This not only makes it hard to control what is happening, but some people are also dying in ways that they do not prefer (de Vocht et al, 2007).I have come to the conclusion that facing ethical issues is inevitable part of a nurse’s professional practice.

On the way out of the house Marco spits in Eddie’s face, shouting, ‘That one!‘ shows that he had a fate or destiny and the way he was going there was no way of avoiding it, he was going to die as a result of this quarrel.Their relationship has disintegrated totally by the end of the play, but at Eddie’s death he seems to apologise, saying simply, ‘My B.!Charlotte Lambie Show preview only The above preview is unformatted text This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Arthur Miller section.The second and final climax comes at the end of the play.

Over the course of his argument he contrasts false love with the real love of a couple.Ultimately he leaves the decision of whether the couple's love is legal up to the reader to allow them to question the truth of love and what separates it from a false love based on lust.Ending with a typical rhyming couplet, he delivers an ultimate truth about the strength and truth of the couple's love.When Shakespeare attempts to explain the love of a couple, he takes a legal tone, using metaphors along the way to support his point.The final couplet ends his argument and is the final support for the couple.