Well Structured Argumentative Essays

Make sure that whatever type of argument you use is suited to your readers and purpose(s).For consistency and overall readability of your work, only use one structure at a time.argument in your research papers.You likely used this type of structure in your synthesis.How to Structure an Argument .

As such, Mr. Morano has put forward a very inconclusive argument, which would not hold up well in an argument.Morano has in the past made good arguments against climate chage, Anna Rose definantly has a better grasp of the ideas of argumentative science.Anna is assuming that because Morano is known for making things up, he will make facts up to support his argument if she engages in a debate with him.While at first glance this argument looks like a solid deductive argument, the premises are lacking.This is a clear example of a modus ponens deductive argument.

Bauer’s argument is based on emotion which makes it hard for the reader to follow.Bauer’s argument is not organized or structured, which makes it very hard to follow.After reading “A Movie, a Word, and my Family’s Battle,” I did not find the argument to be effective.The argument must be organized and structured so that it lays out a clear agenda; it spells out the question to be answered and the issue to be covered, so that the reader has a clear and focused idea of what the argument is supposed to be about.Bauer’s argument was mostly a lot of finger pointing at the movie industry and their lack of compassion when using the word “retard.” Furthermore, the writer expresses society’s lack of compassion for the intellectually disabled commu...

An argument can have structure and strength.Unlike proof, an argument can be defeated.An argument is only allowed on condition that all objections that have been raised are in turn defeated.An argument is open to objections.It does, however, make it possible to distinguish between an argument and a proof.

If this happens, then the player cannot concentrate in his studies as well in his game (Wulf).The author said that giving the athletes money for each game they play will motivate more the players to play well and not just only the pride and tradition of the university will they earn.What should determine whether an argument is well written or not?One of the important guidelines for an essay to be considered well written is the structure of thoughts.There are different views or basis in order for an argument to be considered a well written one.

The points of your argument should be arranged in some structure which is logical and persuasive.Your tutor(s) will be perfectly satisfied if you simply answer their essay questions in a sensible and competent manner.But remember that you are not usually required to be original.The best essays are often produced by people who have taken the trouble to acquaint themselves both with the principal ‘set books’ and with secondary works of commentary and criticism as well.An essay will be rewarded with a good mark if it competently reviews all the well-known arguments in a subject and reaches a balanced conclusion.

Kant 's refutation seems to provide a reasonable counter-argument to Anselm 's ontological argument as the concept of a definition proving its own existence seems farcical, and if structured too simplistically can appear to beg the question.As a simplified version of Anselm 's ontological argument, the argument mentioned in the question is noticeably flawed, and I will make reference to Gaunilo 's refutation, Kant 's argument as well as some of my own examples.In order to properly analyse the argument, it must first be broken down to its structure as so: .The argument mentioned in the question does not appear to be very specific with how it defines "greatness" which could be a source of confusion, however it is difficult to argue against...

This is because the nature of the conclusion rules, as well as the structure of its language is left unspecified unlike the case of premises.Deductive and inductive: Types of validity, not types of argument.This implies that, in the argument, the premises are supposed to provide strong support for the conclusion such that if they are true, then there is no way the conclusion could be false.On the other hand, an inductive argument is a kind of an argument that purpose to increase the possibility of its conclusion.Argument and Computation, 1(2), 93-124. .

2.Previous attempts to solve the argument ( Are provided from literature).5.Connecting the argument with the provided facts.4.Repercussion of the argument in case it is not finally solved(supported with sources).The idea that a theory created on a base of some sort of argument answers the question “how to write an argumentative essay”.A good argumentative essay has several paragraphs that should be concentrated on different aspects of the essay 1.Introduction (The reader is introduced to the analyzed phenomenon and the opinion is revealed through a strong thesis statement).

If you chose to approach your argument like Toulmin model compare to Rogerian argument you may find that most of reader and/or the challenger will put up their defense up before actually taking into mind what the outcome maybe.I find it not to be as structured compared to Toulmin method, but in the other hand using Rogerain Argument you are working together to find a solution together rather than whose position is wrong or right.If I had to choose between the Rogerian Argument and the Toulmin model to analyze an argument, I would have chosen Toulmin.I find the Toulmin would help me examine the argument.By using this type of strategy, you would find a common ground with your challenger and your own position may be more accepting to your c...

This argument is not falsifiable, making it more metaphysics than any result of science, and even if it were to be taken as speculation the argument is still not supported well by existing evidence, it is also somewhat of a tautology in that the argument states that life is able to exist because the Universe can support its existence.The argument for poor design is coherent with the theories of evolution, which suggests that features that were evolved for certain uses which no longer become relevant are then reused for other different functions which may not be optimal but rely on the least evolutionary change.This also touches on the argument from poor design or the dysteleological argument.Charles Darwin and Richard Dawkins were both p...

Lynda uses informal diction as well as simple language in order to create an emotional appeal to her readers.Deductive argumentation is starting with a theory and then proving that theory.Allan definitely uses this approach as he states his theory as his thesis right at the beginning, “[t]he report’s recommendations for legal reforms make good sense”(24), and throughout the rest of his article he uses facts in order to prove his side of the argument on surrogates.Allan’s structure flows nicely and is structured like an essay as he clearly states a thesis and does not use personal pronouns.In conclusion, both Lynda and Allan use different types of diction, structure and argumentation in order to captivate their two dissimilar audiences on...

The argument in the article could have stood out more clearly if the writer tried to probe deeper more in his analysis of Hagrahan’s arguments.He elucidated the author’s (Hanrahan) ideas and his thoughts well that the issue of stopping illegal immigration surfaced in the document.The conclusion contained the writer’s stand on the argument.Argumentative Force & Coherence .This seems to be common among writers using the first person mode.

The concept of accidental attachment between body and soul can show the body as corruptible, and the soul incorruptible.This leads to Avicenna explaining that the relationship between the soul and the body must be an accidental, rather than essential, attachment.Avicenna explains this accidental attachment concept by writing, “And if this is an accidental and not an essential attachment, then, with the corruption of the one term only th... ... middle of paper ... ...ly, is another example of the argument being hard to follow occurs when Avicenna states, “But if the existence of one thing necessitates the existence of another, the corruption of the former does not necessarily entail that of the later” (Avicenna 203).I see this as an examp...

Cause & Effect: Purpose – To convince, motivate or move readers toward a certain point of view or opinion Structure – Structural Components: Intro & thesis, Opposing & qualifying ideas, Strong evidence, Style & tone, Compelling conclusion Two Tips – 1.Do not neglect opposing viewpoints and arguments in the essay.As soon as you claim that one cause or effect is more crucial than the others, you have developed a thesis.Avoid forming a thesis based on a negative claim Persuasion: Purpose- Persuasive writing, also referred to as a creative writing or an argument, is a piece of writing in which the writer uses words to convince the reader of his/her view regarding an issue.Structure- Persuasive writing, also referred to as a c...

Using the rhetorical triangle, we can illustrate how the documentary utilizes the three points of logos, ethos, and pathos in order to establish a well founded, credible, and effective argument.The rhetorical triangle provides the structure; the frame of a well thought out and well presented meaningful argument.One could argue that if an argument lacks any part of the rhetorical triangle, the argument is incomplete, and has no credibility or effectiveness.Without the use of the rhetorical triangle, trying to create a well founded, credible account of anything would be difficult.He does a great job of creating a convincing argument – one that is difficult to pick apart and find fault within.

The facts are present, along with plenty of support, but the way Rollin chose to convey her argument to the reader was very ineffective.Though her argument may be passionate, the organization, diction, and overall tone of the essay do not seem to be the most efficient for her cause.Betty Rollin could have had a very strong argument.She does not focus on an individual argument without interrupting it in some way, sometimes with witty remarks, or even excessive quotes.Norton and Company, 2000.

Keillor, Garrison.The topic sentences for each of the paragraphs are well supported.The author’s argument is implemented very well in his writing style.“The Republicans Were Right, But -.” Time 22 February 1999: 102. .I liked this essay based upon the author’s argument, the use of symbolism, and the author’s structure of the essay.

Bush’s method of topic by topic argument along with many emotional appeals was a rather effective way of winning the audience’s support.By appealing to the emotions of the audience Bush was able to give the audience issues they could relate to as well as issues they would feel strongly about.With an emotionally involved audience Bush was able to gather a great number of supporters of his party, just as he intended in his original purpose.As I explain these appeals I will also give an insight into the argumentative structure and why it is apparent in this particular speech.With the topical structure and the appeals used, the speech was a very effective tool in gaining support for the Republican Party from the northern Arizonan audience.

This reinforces a strong argument, which make the reader question the reason this is, and also appeals to ethos and logos but also allows him to come across as a well-informed individual, and leaves ... .The reader to not only were they the body paragraphs were proved another was by atlas’s carefully thought out structure but they also.This allowed the reader to .this allowed for easy reading since all of the paragraphs were in a chronological order and supporting paragraphs were in the right, place as in well the was carefully thought out, each of supporting arguments were in the correct order and made sense, but also they were separated appropriately....macare, which allows him have to connect the fact back to his last one being back ...

Industrialization Argument The logic — formulate a (national) industrialization plan/policy and stick to it.The two most traditional arguments in this category are the essential industry argument and the strategic (i.e., defense related) commodity argument.Colbert (of France) put the argument as follows in 1666: “It is better to buy French rather than foreign products even if the French ones are a little less good and a little more expensive.This argument was at the core of organized labor’s opposition to a free trade agreement with Mexico.The Argument — We are losing jobs and workers vote.

The linking words you use will depend on the way you are developing your argument.Well according to most of the sources that I have come across, a basic structure keeps coming up.Demonstration of your ability to reflect on own context and present relevant argument .Put together an argument that can both show your knowledge of the subject material, and putting it into an argumentative context.The main body of the essay should develop your argument or theme.

For instance, in the Catalan language, an intransitive verbs of external argument may be represented as postverbal bare plural subject due to the unaccusative verb’s ability to licence a postverbal bare plural subject.While the unaccusative verbs carry an internal line of argument, the intransitive verbs carry an external argument though both of them appear to have a similar meaning.In conclusion, Eguzkitza and Kaiser (1999) show that in German as well as in other romance languages, the postverbal position of the subject results from the movement arising from the assigning of nominative case.While Burzio’s (1986) argument receives backing from fellow academicians, such as Baker (1988) and Abraham et al.In his argument, he insists that si...

(i. e. focusing on the latent, covert mechanisms of discrimination; patriarchal gender ideology is structural, similar and to and combined with other discriminatory practices in our societies).6) Raising as problematic the notion of scientific neutrality (all knowledge is socially constructed!)3) The theories as well as the methodologies are usually eclectic; i.e., theories and methods are integrated which are adequate in understanding and explaining the object under investigation.This entails some eclecticism, as well as pragmatism.8) The categories and tools for the analysis are defined according to all these steps and procedures as well as to the specific problem under investigation.

The human capital argument would seem to be the most limited of the explanatory theses in many ways as it suggests that people are rewarded for their previous investment into their own education and training – and there does not seem to be a consistent difference between the sexes that can bear out this argument (Miller et al., 2004, p.29).This produces a circular argument: gender segregation does not necessarily result in uneven economic conditions per se.This is apparently the situation that occurs with reference to Blackburn et al.’s (2002, p.523) consideration of Hakim’s preference theory, which attempts to knit together the human capital argument with the rational choice consideration; the weakness of the explanations is demonstrate...

Through my growth and experience as a writer, I believe with dedication and eagerness to learn, I can gain more knowledge on the writing process and learn about more life messages in the next AP English course I take.Although, I feel my writing has gotten better, I feel there are a lot of improvements to be made that can help me reach the next level in my senior English class as well in college....esses were, I would probably tell them my organization, style, transitioning, and paragraphing seem to be some of the things I struggle with most.... middle of paper ... .My writing would become a lot more stronger as the year went on, especially wh... .

When one adds a public event such as the Minnesota appeal court case to private struggles like those couples who have to go from lawyer to lawyer to approximate legal protections their straight counterparts take for granted, as well as those AIDS survivors who are shut out of their partner’s dying days by biological family members, only one solution is obvious (Quindlen 410).Here, Quindlen appeal to the readers emotions and captures the reader on a personal level by giving an example of a person who is being shut out of the... .The quote from Quindlen herself shows sarcasm and serves as a reality check for those who take a negative radical notion on gay marriage.The example of the Minnesota appeals court gives a real life example of a ga...

Throughout his essay though, we can see that Hitler’s thinking is predominated by a fallacious belief that begs the question: what proof do you have that Aryans are superior to other peoples?All of these are simply apparatus that a terribly arrogant and insane man wields to acquire the absolute power that he did in fact attain.The Structure of Argument.Martin's, 2009.Rottenberg, Annette T., and .

She employs the problem-solving structure, presents sorrowful examples, and show respect for different viewpoints of technology to convince readers effectively that it is important for humans to maintain a humane relationship, which is unable to be developed by technology.Modern people spend most of their time doing most of their communication via the Internet and are moving away from making a real conversation with the people sitting around them.Technology has changed our ways of communication; it may be the right time to change back.They should know that it is impossible to truly understand those whom you communicate with in cyberspace.Logos, ethos, and pathos are powerful components of all persuasive articles.

I could not have said it better myself.Throughout the essay, he makes it very clear how he feels about the government and war.His argument may seem true to many, but he does not provide us with any evidence that these statements are accurate.Even though some of his assertions lack evidence, Zinn uses authority and structure very well to make his argument effective.Towards the end of the essay, he writes, “[instead] of being feared for our military prowess, we should want to be respected for our dedication to human rights” (161).