...Start of the How did the war start, and should we have been at war with Iraq ...
Thousands of protest took place in Britain before the war, as military action began in Iraq. School students disrupted many city centres stopping traffic. Four thousand school students massed in Parliament Square in London. In Liverpool, police were called to remove protestors including many school children who blocked the Mersey tunnel. Many hundreds of schools were affected across the UK. How did it come to this, and so quickly? History can be a roller coaster ride. But for all the markers along the way, it is still hard to understand how in 18 short months the ride has led from Osama Bin Laden to Saddam Hussein; from a nightmarish day of terrorist attacks in the US to an unprovoked war against a country that had nothing to do with those attacks.
...Middle of the How did the war start, and should we have been at war with Iraq ...
As Tony Blair went ahead with his decision on backing the US in the war against Iraq, Robin Cook cabinet minister and also a good friend of Tony’s, wrote a resignation letter to Tony . He also gave a resignation speech, in his devastating resignation speech Mr cook said among other things that, ‘… The worst thing about this situation is that if the Bush family hadn’t fixed the US election we’d have Al Gore as president and would not be sending our troops into this war… ‘ There were lots of reasons for war but were outnumbered by the reasons against. Some of the reasons for the war were: to eliminate the weapons of mass destruction, to eliminate the threat of international terrorism and to promote democracy in Iraq and surrounding areas. The only reason this war started off was because of the weapons of mass destruction Saddam was claimed to have BUT as none were found, why did we go to war? What was the real reason? There are no advantages of war, it is unethical. Innocent people have been killed and without the support of the UN if all goes wrong Tony Blair could lose his job. This discussion is how the war started and whether or not we should have been at war with Iraq. The first main reason for us not to have been at war with Iraq is that innocent people who haven’t done anything wrong have been killed, Tony Blair said before the war… … If I thought we were going to kill half a million, I wouldn’t be here.
...End of the How did the war start, and should we have been at war with Iraq ...
There are 16 other countries that have nuclear weapons, 25 countries may have chemical weapons, 19 other countries may have biological weapons, and 16 other countries may have missile systems. So if the biggest producer and inventor of all these weapons America is that desperate it should go and pick a fight elsewhere and eliminate its false concern for democracy. No’ is a misunderstood word for a power with a false sense of security. ‘No’ is what Saddam Hussein said to the largest UK and US oil multinationals. ‘No’ is what the world should be saying not only to this war, but to the other methods of domination (trade for example) sought by the US and its supporters. War is never the first answer it is always the last resort. But the alternative, in this case, was to leave Saddam there with his ‘so called’ weapons of mass destruction. War doesn’t determine whose right or wrong it just determines whose left.
We will write for you an essay on any given topic for 3 hoursOrder now!
Mass graves discovered after the war revealed about the atrocities carried out by him and his troops.Against All Enemies: Inside America’s War on Terror.When asked why the US went into war in Iraq, Bush said, “He retained the knowledge, the materials, the means and the intent to produce weapons of mass destruction and could have passed this knowledge to our terrorist enemies.He forced the country into a civil war, which is still going on.It was mentioned clearly that the USA would no longer allow any country to question the US military supremacy, as it happened during the Cold War era.
Israel is the most benefitted country in the Middle East region, due to the Iraq War, apart from the US (Israeli, 2004.Accordingly, the US carefully examined the strategic motivations of Iraq and drew the attention of the United Nations to this issue (Persian Gulf War, First or Gulf War, 2006).There were no such weapons in Iraq and the claims of the US and the UK, with regard to biological and chemical weapons were merely made to justify the waging of war against Iraq.Some experts argue that the war in Iraq will be a continuous process, with no end for the people of Iraq.The motivation behind this international war was to get domination in that area by controlling the oil fields (Persian Gulf War, First or Gulf War, 2006).
“ProCon’s Iraq War Examination” n.d. Retrieved October 5, 2006 from .Several leaders from other nations have cautioned the US President against taking drastic action against Iraq as they feel that the weapons and research program discovered there did not merit going to war.WMD and terrorism are very new concepts of war weapons developed to cause grave destruction and death even to civilians in a swift and sweeping manner.The United Nations Charter which was adopted in 1945 to prevent the recurrence of the circumstances that led to the outbreak of World War II was limited in the sense that it only sought to address the traditional threats posed by states or countries, which at the time, were the only types known to everyone, including the...
|Uploaded time:||May 14, 2022|
|Type of work:||essay|