...Start of the Scientific Management in Retrospect Essay...
Injanuary 1912, Frederick W. Taylor, the center of a highly publicized controversy over the effects of “scientific manage ment, ” testified before a House of Representatives committee investigating his handiwork. His first objective, he explained, was to “sweep away a good deal of rubbish.” Scientific management was “not any efficiency device. It is not a new system of figuring costs; it is not a new system of paying men . it is not holding a stop watch on a man . it is not time study; it is not motion study. ” I n fact, it was “not any of the devices which the average man calls to mind when scientific management is spoken of.” On the contrary, it was “a complete mental revolution on the part of the workingman” and an “equally complete mental revolution on the part of those on management’s side. And without this complete mental revolution on both sides scientific management does not exist. “* Taylor’s identification of scientific management with a “mental revolution” had several purposes.
...Middle of the Scientific Management in Retrospect Essay...
The reports of Amer ican engineers who visited the Soviet Union provide one measure of his impact. Royal R. Keely, a peripheral member of Taylor’s coterie who made an extended survey in 1920, was contemptuous of Soviet industry.73 Walter Polakov, a prominent consultant of leftist sympathies who spent a year and half in the Soviet Union a decade later, reported only modest progress. “All of the vital details of scheduling, dispatching, production control, progress records, etc. are left mainly to chance.” Time and motion study, he added, “is a thing little known in the U.S.S.R.” 74 While Polakov probably missed subtle changes of approach and attitude as well as applications outside manufacturing, his judgment was a commentary on the corrosive effects of political infighting and the intensity of grassroots opposition. Despite official support for nearly a decade, scientific management had few friends in mines or factories. The management expert was “the most hated man in industry.” As Gastev himself acknowledged in 1927, “he is op posed by the director; he is opposed by the chief engineer; to a large degree he is opposed by the foreman; he clashes with the opposition of the workers. ” 75 Donald Filtzer’s recent examination of Soviet time study data attests to the enormity of the challenge.76 As Gastev and his allies fell out of favor, the resistance grew increas ingly violent.
...End of the Scientific Management in Retrospect Essay...
38-80; Duccio Bigazzi, “Management and Labour in Italy, 1906-45,” in Tolliday and Zeitlin, The Automobile Industry and Its Workers, pp. Daito, “Memorandum”; Andrew Gordon, “Araki Toichiro and the Shaping of Labor Management,” and Kenji Okuda, “comment,” in Tsunehiko Yui and Keiichiro Nakagawa, Japanese Management in Historical Perspective (Tokyo, 1989), pp. See also Satoshi Sasaki, “On Materials of Scientific Management in Japan in Meiji-Taisho Era, “Japan Business History Review 21 (April 1986), pp. 28-47; Sasaki, “The Introduction of Time Study Method into Mitsubishi Electric Co. at Kobe Works, “Japan Business History Review 21 (January 1987), pp. Both articles are in Japanese. I am indebted to Hitoshi Imai for these references. See Daniel Nelson, “Scientific Management and the Workplace, 1920 1935,” in Sanford Jacoby, ed., Masters and Managers (New York, 1990), pp. Schachter, Frederick Taylor and the Public Administration Community, pp.
We will write for you an essay on any given topic for 3 hours
Order now!In France, Le Chatelier translated Taylor’s work and introduced scientific management throughout government owned plants during World War I.These include Notes on Belting (1894), A Piece-Rate System (1895), Shop Management (1903), Art of Cutting Metals (1906), and The Principles of Scientific Management (1911).[26] Harry Braverman’s work, Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century, published in 1974 was critical of scientific management.[8] Taylor’s scientific management consisted of four principles: 1.Replace rule-of-thumb work methods with methods based on a scientific study of the tasks.•Harvard University, one of the first American universities to offer a graduate degree in business management in 190...
Nevertheless, we must pay close attention to the manifest dangers and risks that might come along with the utilization of the principles of Taylor’s scientific management.Aside from the minute implementation of the “scientific management” principles in the McDonald’s organization you could find numerous realizations and modifications of Taylor’s ideas in all kinds of areas of managerial practices, be it in form of management intervention programmes or complex assessment centres.In the following I will elaborate the presence of Taylor’s “scientific management” principles in current organisational management practices with the help of the example of the McDonald’s organization.Summing up you can say that Taylor’s “scientific management” pr...
Scientific management as presented by Taylor offered a chance for scientific training and education of all the workers with an intention of increasing their on hand skills and basic understanding of their working environment.With this in mind it is worth to note that Taylor’s scientific management principles although proposed over a century ago are being felt even in the modern day practices in institutions.In conclusion, Taylor’s scientific management has served to shape the behaviors witnessed in today’s organizations.Scientific management brought a revolution to management systems which have them evolved with time to accommodate new ideas and other changing variables in the workplaces.The second and third principles of the scientific ...
Paper Description:
Words: | 14018 |
Pages: | 35.0 |
Uploaded time: | June 4, 2022 |
Author: | admin |
Type of work: | essay |
Similar Topics